Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Mutual benefit: Rethinking social inclusion
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE).
2005 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

geography, where segregation and social exclusion of neighbourhoods and marginalised groups are mounting problems. Concurrently, globalisation and structural changes have altered the conditions for the national state and the public sector as well as for other actors. Previous efforts to decrease social inequalities have failed to achieve sufficient results. Today, promoting social inclusion and integration is a top priority on the political agenda and calls for innovative interventions.

These changes in society have resulted in new constellations of collaboration, crosscutting sectors and borders in which various actors work towards collective goals. Many of the issues and subsequent responsibility that once belonged to the public sector are now handled through interplay between private and public actors in so-called governance arrangements.

The thesis discusses if governance arrangements where new actors engage to promote social inclusion and integration can be more effective than traditional efforts. To reach satisfactory results, the relations between involved actors need to be solid and trustworthy, and the perspective of benefit must be long-term. In this respect, social capital is a central theory as it focuses on social relations between people, and emphasises networks, trust and reciprocal norms as important foundations for such relations.

The aim of the thesis is to rethink strategies to promote social inclusion and integration by providing a theoretical discussion about value-creation. An assumption analyzed is that in situations where power and other resources are unevenly distributed, all parties involved can benefit by trustful cooperation. The ambition is to critically examine the concepts of governance and social capital, and to discuss their possibilities and shortcomings related to the value-creating processes. The usefulness and capacity of the theoretical framework is tested by analysing two unconventional approaches to promote social inclusion and societal integration, carried out by a public housing company in Malmö.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH , 2005. , 325 p.
Trita-INFRA, ISSN 1651-0216 ; 05:001
Keyword [en]
Social sciences, Social inclusion, integration, segregation, social exclusion, social capital, governance, value-creation, value-creating processes
Keyword [sv]
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-135ISBN: 91-7323-107-XOAI: diva2:7191
Public defence
2005-02-25, Sal D3, KTH, Lindstedtsvägen 5, Stockholm, 09:30
QC 20101018Available from: 2005-02-20 Created: 2005-02-20 Last updated: 2010-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(27749 kB)670 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 27749 kBChecksum SHA-1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Martinson, Lina
By organisation
School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE)
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 670 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 1534 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link