Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing & benchmarking engineering methods on the prediction of X-31 aerodynamics
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Aerodynamics.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Aerodynamics.
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2010, 2010-4694- p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

NATO RTO-AVT-161 is an assessment of Stability and Control Prediction Methods for NATO Air and Sea Vehicles. Though the assessment includes the use of advanced CFD methods, a number of useful engineering methods are available for fast and economic estimates of the aerodynamic characteristics of complex flight vehicles. The objective of this paper is to investigate the use of three specific engineering methods on the X-31 fighter configuration for which CFD, wind tunnel, and flight test data are available for comparison and evaluation purposes. The emphasis is on static longitudinal stability aspects up to high angles of attack; however, selected asymmetric and unsteady effects are considered. Results from the engineering methods are in good agreement with experiment and CFD for angles of attack up to 15 degrees for most cases and higher angles for some cases. Results for pitching moment are in good agreement with CFD, but many of the nonlinear characteristics of the airplane are not predicted by the engineering methods. The quality of the longitudinal stability results is discussed in terms of the prediction of the center of pressure on the vehicle. The results provide improved understanding of the continued usefulness of engineering methods as an analysis tool during the design phase and into the flight test diagnostic phase of a new aircraft.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. 2010-4694- p.
Keyword [en]
Aerodynamic characteristics, Analysis tools, Angles of attack, Center of pressure, CFD method, Design phase, Economic estimate, Engineering methods, Fighter configuration, Flight test, Flight test data, Flight vehicles, High angles of attack, Longitudinal stability, Nonlinear characteristics, Pitching moments, Prediction methods, Stability and control, Unsteady effects
National Category
Vehicle Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-149691Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-78649499363ISBN: 978-161738926-9 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-149691DiVA: diva2:745273
Conference
28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 28 June 2010 through 1 July 2010, Chicago, IL, United States
Note

QC 20140910

Available from: 2014-09-10 Created: 2014-08-26 Last updated: 2014-09-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Scopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tomac, MaximilianRizzi, Arthur
By organisation
Aerodynamics
Vehicle Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf