Additional remarks related with the discussion inaugurated by the article "Incompatibility of the Shuttleworth equation with Hermann's mathematical structure of thermodynamics" by D. J. Bottomley et al. [Surf. Sci. 603 (2009) 97]
2010 (English)In: Surface Science, ISSN 0039-6028, E-ISSN 1879-2758, Vol. 604, no 11-12, 1062-1063 p.Article in journal, Editorial material (Refereed) Published
Jan Christer Eriksson and Anatoly I. Rusanov critically analyze a paper titled 'Incompatibility of the Shuttleworth equation with Hermann's mathematical structure of thermodynamics' by D. J. Bottomley and co-researchers. According to him, the problem of double counting that Bottomley and co-researchers supposed to be due to involving pairs of terms of the kind xdy + ydx, is not a true research issue but rather a pedagogical one. Within the formal scheme adopted by Gibbs, this problem is properly dealt with by means of a Gibbs Duhem condition. The critics underline that the incompatibility with the mathematical structure of thermodynamics erroneously claimed by Bottomley and co-researchers would apply not just to solid but to liquid interfaces as well, thus invalidating even the firmly rooted Gibbs surface tension equation.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 604, no 11-12, 1062-1063 p.
Gibbs surface, Liquid interface, Mathematical structure, Research issues, Shuttleworth equation, Phase interfaces, Research, Surface tension, Thermodynamics
Physical Sciences Chemical Sciences
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-149399DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.03.013ISI: 000278533100033ScopusID: 2-s2.0-77951879797OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-149399DiVA: diva2:745411
QC 201409102014-09-102014-08-212014-09-10Bibliographically approved