Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Advantages and limitations of navigation-based multicriteria optimization (MCO) for localized prostate cancer IMRT planning
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Mathematics (Dept.), Optimization and Systems Theory. RaySearch Labs, Stockholm, Sweden.
2014 (English)In: Medical Dosimetry, ISSN 0958-3947, Vol. 39, no 3, 205-211 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Efficacy of inverse planning is becoming increasingly important for advanced radiotherapy techniques. This study's aims were to validate multicriteria optimization (MCO) in RayStation (v2.4, RaySearch Laboratories, Sweden) against standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) optimization in Oncentra (v4.1, Nucletron BV, the Netherlands) and characterize dose differences due to conversion of navigated MCO plans into deliverable multileaf collimator apertures. Step-and-shoot IMRT plans were created for 10 patients with localized prostate cancer using both standard optimization and MCO. Acceptable standard IMRT plans with minimal average rectal dose were chosen for comparison with deliverable MCO plans. The trade-off was, for the MCO plans, managed through a user interface that permits continuous navigation between fluence-based plans. Navigated MCO plans were made deliverable at incremental steps along a trajectory between maximal target homogeneity and maximal rectal sparing. Dosimetric differences between navigated and deliverable MCO plans were also quantified. MCO plans, chosen as acceptable under navigated and deliverable conditions resulted in similar rectal sparing compared with standard optimization (33.7 +/- 1.8 Gy vs 35.5 +/- 4.2 Gy, p = 0.117). The dose differences between navigated and deliverable MCO plans increased as higher priority was placed on rectal avoidance. If the best possible deliverable MCO was chosen, a significant reduction in rectal dose was observed in comparison with standard optimization (30.6 +/- 1.4 Gy vs 35.5 +/- 4.2 Gy, p = 0.047). Improvements were, however, to some extent, at the expense of less conformal dose distributions, which resulted in significantly higher doses to the bladder for 2 of the 3 tolerance levels. In conclusion, similar IMRT plans can be created for patients with prostate cancer using MCO compared with standard optimization. Limitations exist within MCO regarding conversion of navigated plans to deliverable apertures, particularly for plans that emphasize avoidance of critical structures. Minimizing these differences would result in better quality treatments for patients with prostate cancer who were treated with radiotherapy using MCO plans.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 39, no 3, 205-211 p.
Keyword [en]
IMRT, MCO, Prostate
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-150914DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.02.002ISI: 000340511100001ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84905254571OAI: diva2:746731

QC 20140915

Available from: 2014-09-15 Created: 2014-09-11 Last updated: 2014-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bokrantz, Rasmus
By organisation
Optimization and Systems Theory
In the same journal
Medical Dosimetry
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 31 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link