Experience of two-stage peer review in the ETAI, 1997 - 2001
2009 (English)In: WMSCI 2009 - The 13th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Jointly with the 15th International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis, ISAS 2009 - Proc., 2009, 285-290 p.Conference paper (Refereed)
We describe the two-stage peer review model that, was used by the Electronic Transact ions on Artificial Intelligence (ETAI) from 1997 to 2001. In the first review stage, which in principle lasted for three months, submitted articles were openly discussed using a web-based forum and communication by email. This provided feedback to the authors for revising the article. In the second review stage, anonymous reviewers judged the revised submission on a pass-fail basis. We discuss the initial reactions to this model, the experience from using it, and the ramifications of (his model for the concept of publication and for priority of results.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. 285-290 p.
Peer review, Web-based forums, Artificial intelligence, Information science, Information systems, Systems analysis, Management information systems
Information Systems, Social aspects
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-152027ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84867245246ISBN: 1934272582ISBN: 978-193427258-9OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-152027DiVA: diva2:749113
13th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, WMSCI 2009, Jointly with the 15th International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis, ISAS 2009, 10 July 2009 through 13 July 2009, Orlando, FL, United States
QC 201409232014-09-232014-09-232014-09-23Bibliographically approved