Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A quasi-experimental evaluation of partnering
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Building and Real Estate Economics.
2008 (English)In: Construction Management and Economics, ISSN 0144-6193, E-ISSN 1466-433X, Vol. 26, no 5, 531-541 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Construction managerial literature often argues that there are gains to be made by using partnering. Voices have however been raised to approach partnering in a more neutral perspective and with well-founded methods of evaluation. This study can be seen as an outcome of the criticisms against earlier empirical evaluations by setting out to provide more tangible data and an improved method for evaluating partnering. A quasi-experimental method has been adopted in order to control for other affecting variables and find the unique effect of partnering. This approach strives to match partnering projects with identical non-partnering projects on every relevant variable except partnering. Six hundred and twenty three site meeting minutes from 20 publicly procured projects have been analysed to extract differences between partnering and non-partnering projects concerning cost and quality. Time delays, the amount of disputes, financial outcome and contract flexibility have been used as indicators. The paper has made a first attempt in trying to push the frontier for partnering evaluations forward by providing a new type of data (site meeting minutes) and applying a well-reputed evaluation method (quasi-experiment). The main result is that no systematic or general trends can be seen in the material. This result casts a shadow over the optimistic results from earlier evaluations and suggests that the main contribution of partnering might lie in its intangible effects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 26, no 5, 531-541 p.
Keyword [en]
Evaluation, Partnering, Research methods, Cost benefit analysis, Project management, Quality control, Research, Partnering evaluations, Quasi-experimental method, Time delays, Construction industry, empirical analysis
National Category
Construction Management
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-154462DOI: 10.1080/01446190802036144ScopusID: 2-s2.0-43049090851OAI: diva2:758106

QC 20141024

Available from: 2014-10-24 Created: 2014-10-20 Last updated: 2015-10-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nyström, Johan
By organisation
Building and Real Estate Economics
In the same journal
Construction Management and Economics
Construction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 31 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link