Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Meta-analysis of peak wall stress in ruptured, symptomatic and intact abdominal aortic aneurysms
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: British Journal of Surgery, ISSN 0007-1323, E-ISSN 1365-2168, Vol. 101, no 11, 1350-1357 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an important cause of sudden death; however, there are currently incomplete means to predict the risk of AAA rupture. AAA peak wall stress (PWS) can be estimated using finite element analysis (FEA) methods from computed tomography (CT) scans. The question is whether AAA PWS can predict AAA rupture. The aim of this systematic review was to compare PWS in patients with ruptured and intact AAA. Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched on 25 May 2013. Case-control studies assessing PWS in asymptomatic intact, and acutely symptomatic or ruptured AAA from CT scans using FEA were included. Data were extracted independently. A random-effects model was used to calculate standard mean differences (SMDs) for PWS measurements. Results: Nine studies assessing 348 individuals were identified and used in the meta-analysis. Results from 204 asymptomatic intact and 144 symptomatic or ruptured AAAs showed that PWS was significantly greater in the symptomatic/ruptured AAAs compared with the asymptomatic intact AAAs (SMD 0.95, 95 per cent confidence interval 0. 71 to 1.18; P < 0. 001). The findings remained significant after adjustment for mean systolic blood pressure, standardized at 120 mmHg(SMD 0.68, 0.39 to 0.96; P < 0. 001). Minimal heterogeneity between studies was noted (I-2 = 0 per cent). Conclusion: This study suggests that PWS is greater in symptomatic or ruptured AAA than in asymptomatic intact AAA.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 101, no 11, 1350-1357 p.
National Category
Medical Equipment Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-155464DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9578ISI: 000342911600004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84907935335OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-155464DiVA: diva2:762861
Note

QC 20141113

Available from: 2014-11-13 Created: 2014-11-06 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Golledge, Jonathan
By organisation
Solid Mechanics (Dept.)
In the same journal
British Journal of Surgery
Medical Equipment Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf