Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Inter-laboratory validation of bioaccessibility testing for metals
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, ISSN 0273-2300, E-ISSN 1096-0295, Vol. 70, no 1, 170-181 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Bioelution assays are fast, simple alternatives to in vivo testing. In this study, the intra- and inter-laboratory variability in bioaccessibility data generated by bioelution tests were evaluated in synthetic fluids relevant to oral, inhalation, and dermal exposure. Using one defined protocol, five laboratories measured metal release from cobalt oxide, cobalt powder, copper concentrate, Inconel alloy, leaded brass alloy, and nickel sulfate hexahydrate. Standard deviations of repeatability (S-r) and reproducibility (S-R) were used to evaluate the intra- and inter-laboratory variability, respectively. Examination of the s(R):s(r) ratios demonstrated that, while gastric and lysosomal fluids had reasonably good reproducibility, other fluids did not show as good concordance between laboratories. Relative standard deviation (RSD) analysis showed more favorable reproducibility outcomes for some data sets; overall results varied more between- than within-laboratories. RSD analysis of s(r) showed good within-laboratory variability for all conditions except some metals in interstitial fluid. In general, these findings indicate that absolute bioaccessibility results in some biological fluids may vary between different laboratories. However, for most applications, measures of relative bioaccessibility are needed, diminishing the requirement for high inter-laboratory reproducibility in absolute metal releases. The inter-laboratory exercise suggests that the degrees of freedom within the protocol need to be addressed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 70, no 1, 170-181 p.
Keyword [en]
Metals, Alloys, UVCBs, Classification, Bioelution, Bioaccessibility, Read-across, Inter-laboratory validation
National Category
Pharmacology and Toxicology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-154753DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.06.021ISI: 000342482200018Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84904408802OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-154753DiVA: diva2:763118
Note

QC 20141113

Available from: 2014-11-13 Created: 2014-10-27 Last updated: 2018-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Herting, GunillaWallinder, Inger Odnevall

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Herting, GunillaWallinder, Inger Odnevall
By organisation
Surface and Corrosion Science
In the same journal
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology
Pharmacology and Toxicology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf