Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Adoption of Ergonomic Innovations for Injury Prevention: Sonographer's scanning support device
KTH, School of Technology and Health (STH), Centres, Centre for Health and Building, CHB.
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Studies of how people relate to the risk of occupational injury indicate that there is a tendency to underestimate the risk at work compared to other risks in society. Ultrasound examinations of the heart involve a static and very uncomfortable working posture for the sonographer. As a result many sonographers experience shoulder and neck pains which can result in long term sickness leaves.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate how a more radical ergonomic innovation, a remote controlled ultrasound robot for cardiac examinations, Medirob, has been adopted. The study was conducted by interviews with department heads and heads of clinics, responsible for the procurement of the equipment.

The results of this study have shown that it is not maybe enough to solve an ergonomic problem with an innovation to get it accepted and used. To prevent injuries the intervention must also have other qualities, for example improved productivity.

National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-158520OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-158520DiVA: diva2:777985
Note

QS 2015

Available from: 2015-01-09 Created: 2015-01-09 Last updated: 2015-02-06Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. The Adoption of Ergonomic Innovations for Injury Prevention: Examples from the building construction and health care industries
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Adoption of Ergonomic Innovations for Injury Prevention: Examples from the building construction and health care industries
2014 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

A good work environment is important for the individual, for industry and for society. The work environment research has, predominantly, targeted identification of problems and the measurement of the size of these problems.

Innovations to reduce the incidence of musculoskeletal disorder, MSD, have been introduced in different branches of industry, but with limited success.

Few of the ergonomic innovations developed for the building and construction industry have reached a sufficient level of adoption. Ergonomic innovations in the health care sector are of an incremental character and seem to have similar problems of adoption as the ones in the building and construction industry.

Three examples of ergonomic innovation are examined in the thesis:

  • a glue spreader for floor layers

  • a four-wheel walker with a lifting device

  • a sonographer’s scanning support device

The studies show that an ergonomic innovation is not adopted for prevention of occupational injury unless the innovation also has other relative advantages apart from the ergonomic ones. For the group who already has sustained an injury, it is enough that the ergonomic problems are solved, while the other, symptom-free group, requires other advantages in order to adopt the innovation; increased production economy seems to be the most prominent potential advantage.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2014. 44 p.
Series
TRITA-STH : report, ISSN 1653-3836 ; 2014:6
Keyword
Ergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomic innovation, adoption, four-wheel walker, lifting device, sonographer support, floor laying
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Research subject
Technology and Health
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-158523 (URN)978-91-7595-417-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2015-01-30, 7093, CHB, Marinens väg 30, Haninge, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20150114

Available from: 2015-01-14 Created: 2015-01-09 Last updated: 2015-02-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(319 kB)113 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 319 kBChecksum SHA-512
d9c0599caa7fe94d842d6d0ef21081fb831c7b0e8a91e151f8e3f13c85861f88dfa333513496b7f48dc218ce7e4a3eb9dd12e7ed02c3c08e0ae64866313669aa
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Glimskär, Bo
By organisation
Centre for Health and Building, CHB
Other Engineering and Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 113 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 151 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf