Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Analysis of the Refined CRUST1.0 Crustal Model and its Gravity Field
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Geodesy and Geoinformatics.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Surveys in geophysics, ISSN 0169-3298, E-ISSN 1573-0956, Vol. 36, no 1, 139-165 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The global crustal model CRUST1.0 (refined using additional global datasets of the solid topography, polar ice sheets and geoid) is used in this study to estimate the average densities of major crustal structures. We further use this refined model to compile the gravity field quantities generated by the Earth's crustal structures and to investigate their spatial and spectral characteristics and their correlation with the crustal geometry in context of the gravimetric Moho determination. The analysis shows that the average crustal density is 2,830 kg/m(3), while it decreases to 2,490 kg/m(3) when including the seawater. The average density of the oceanic crust (without the seawater) is 2,860 kg/m(3), and the average continental crustal density (including the continental shelves) is 2,790 kg/m(3). The correlation analysis reveals that the gravity field corrected for major known anomalous crustal density structures has a maximum (absolute) correlation with the Moho geometry. The Moho signature in these gravity data is seen mainly at the long-to-medium wavelengths. At higher frequencies, the Moho signature is weakening due to a noise in gravity data, which is mainly attributed to crustal model uncertainties. The Moho determination thus requires a combination of gravity and seismic data. In global studies, gravimetric methods can help improving seismic results, because (1) large parts of the world are not yet sufficiently covered by seismic surveys and (2) global gravity models have a relatively high accuracy and resolution. In regional and local studies, the gravimetric Moho determination requires either a detailed crustal density model or seismic data (for a combined gravity and seismic data inversion). We also demonstrate that the Earth's long-wavelength gravity spectrum comprises not only the gravitational signal of deep mantle heterogeneities (including the core-mantle boundary zone), but also shallow crustal structures. Consequently, the application of spectral filtering in the gravimetric Moho determination will remove not only the gravitational signal of (unknown) mantle heterogeneities, but also the Moho signature at the long-wavelength gravity spectrum.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 36, no 1, 139-165 p.
Keyword [en]
Correlation, Crust, Density, Gravity, Mantle, Moho
National Category
Geochemistry Geophysics
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-158379DOI: 10.1007/s10712-014-9299-6ISI: 000345435200005ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84911989780OAI: diva2:779965

QC 20150113

Available from: 2015-01-13 Created: 2015-01-07 Last updated: 2015-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bagherbandi, MohammadSjöberg, Lars E.
By organisation
Geodesy and Geoinformatics
In the same journal
Surveys in geophysics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 26 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link