Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Urban Development Plans and Permits: Inefficiencies in the Swedish legal system
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Real Estate Planning and Land Law.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Real Estate Planning and Land Law.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Real Estate Planning and Land Law.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7886-5926
2015 (English)In: Challenges for Governance Structures in Urban and Regional Development / [ed] Erwin Hepperle, Robert Dixon-Gough, Reinfried Mansberger, Jenny Paulsson, Franz Reuter and Meltem Yilmaz, Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, 2015, 75-88 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In the Swedish urban development system there seems to be a gap between the Planningand Building Act and the practice. The aim of the article is to empirically show how theSwedish planning process is conducted and to analyse whether the legislation can be betteradapted to practice. It could be concluded from the study that the Detailed Plan(detaljplan) in Sweden is no longer a plan, but rather an early “permit decision” for aspecific development project, which normally is initiated before plan preparation. Incombination with “aestethic design programs”, the Detailed Plan tend to be increasinglydetailed and the building permit examination serves no real function for the exteriordesign of the buildings. The question is then whether two decisions are really needed: botha detailed plan and a building permit in cases where the decisions concern in principle thesame thing. The proposal presented in the article is to use one “building decision” in orderto both obtaining a more efficient process, and avoiding the friction that sometimes occursin the coordination between the Detailed Plan and the building permit.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, 2015. 75-88 p.
Keyword [en]
urban development, urban planning, detailed plan, building permit, Sweden
National Category
Law and Society
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-160100ISBN: 9783728136572 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-160100DiVA: diva2:788442
Note

QC 20150309

Available from: 2015-02-14 Created: 2015-02-14 Last updated: 2015-03-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publication at Research Gate

Authority records BETA

Paulsson, Jenny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kalbro, ThomasLindgren, EidarPaulsson, Jenny
By organisation
Real Estate Planning and Land Law
Law and Society

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 272 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf