Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Strategies for managing micro-level contextual ambidexterity: Combining exploration and exploitation in R&D
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Machine Design (Dept.), Integrated Product Development.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0592-4002
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Marcus Wallenberg Laboratory MWL.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3826-3055
2015 (English)In: Proceedings of the 15th annual CINet conference, 2015Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In this paper we study the achievement of contextual ambidexterity at the individual level, i.e. the micro-level. We explore how employees in four different teams in an automotive company use different strategies to prioritise time between, on the one hand exploration such as pre-development activities and research and, on the other hand exploitation such as realising set concepts in the later phases of the product development process. Based on our findings we argue that the status of exploratory activities must be elevated to equal levels with exploitation activities if ambidexterity is to achieved without using separation as the main strategy. We propose that clear goal setting, stricter follow-up of exploratory activities, and high levels of endurance among managers in change initiatives are ways to achieve a contextually ambidextrous organisation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
Keyword [en]
Contextual ambidexterity, exploration, exploitation
National Category
Work Sciences Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-160628OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-160628DiVA: diva2:790582
Conference
15th annual CINet conference, 7-9 September, 2014, Budapest, Hungary
Note

QC 20150225. NV 20160129

Available from: 2015-02-25 Created: 2015-02-25 Last updated: 2016-01-29Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Innovation under pressure: Reclaiming the micro-level exploration space
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Innovation under pressure: Reclaiming the micro-level exploration space
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Research & Development (R&D) departments are becoming increasingly structured and routine-based, with tight schedules and daily follow-ups. This way of working stems from increased demands for delivering products to customers quickly and with high quality at a low price. At the same time, these organisations are faced with the challenge of coming up with new ideas that can become the foundations of tomorrow’s innovations. This means that R&D departments must achieve both exploration, in terms of coming up with new ideas, and exploitation in terms of turning existing ideas into products available on the market. If these dual perspectives are to be met within a single work unit, the employees in that unit must achieve what we call contextual ambidexterity. Previous research has shown this to be difficult to achieve and has offered little guidance for organisations about how to organise and manage their operations in order to increase their chances of achieving contextual ambidexterity.The aim of this thesis is to explore challenges related to innovation that are encountered at the micro-level in contextually ambidextrous organisations and to shed light on factors that explain those challenges.This study has combined survey data with interview data from several organisations to analyse the relationship between aspects of efficiency and aspects of creativity. It was found that employees in a contextually ambidextrous organisation struggle to ensure enough micro-level exploration space, in other words, they have trouble finding time to explore ideas and making room for novel ideas.This research shows that a contextually ambidextrous approach in R&D will likely exert two main challenges related to innovation. The first challenge is a crowding out of exploratory activities in favour of exploitatory activities. One reason for this is the combination of using productivity goals for exploitation and not using any similar targets for exploration activities. Large discrepancies in how these two types of activities are treated runs the risk that the one that is less monitored – most often exploration – is likely to be crowded out in favour of the one that is more intensely monitored.A second possible challenge is the demand on predictability in project progress that is often built into organisations as a means to enhance exploitation. This aim for predictability might create a reluctance to introduce new projects with high levels of novelty because the introduction of novel ideas contains uncertainties that jeopardise the adherence to the project plan. The combination of this view of novelty in the later phases of product development and the crowding out of exploratory activities could possibly lead to insufficient room for novel ideas to gain ground in the organisation, and this could lead to less innovative output.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2015. vi, 101 p.
Series
TRITA-MMK, ISSN 1400-1179 ; 2015:02
Keyword
Ambidexterity, exploration, exploitation, creativity, innovation, micro-level exploration space, operational level, operations, operational effectiveness, employee, lean, lean thinking, process management, streamlining, flow
National Category
Mechanical Engineering
Research subject
Machine Design
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-160618 (URN)978-91-7595-449-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2015-03-20, Kollegiesalen, Brinellvägen 8, KTH, Stockholm, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20150225

Available from: 2015-02-25 Created: 2015-02-25 Last updated: 2015-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Lund, KatarinaGlav, Ragnar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lund, KatarinaGlav, Ragnar
By organisation
Integrated Product DevelopmentMarcus Wallenberg Laboratory MWL
Work SciencesProduction Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 276 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf