GM Crops, the Hubris Argument and the Nature of Agriculture
2015 (English)In: Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, ISSN 1187-7863, E-ISSN 1573-322X, Vol. 28, no 1, 161-177 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
In this paper, I investigate the moral status of agricultural biotechnology and, more specifically, genetically modified (GM) crops by employing the hubris argument. The old notion of hubris, given to us by the ancient Greeks, provides a narrative from which we can understand ourselves and technology. Ronald Sandler offers us an understanding of hubris he claims gives us a prima facie reason and a presumption against the use of GM crops. I argue that Sandler's hubris argument fails for several reasons: (1) Sander and many others fail to have a proper understanding of agriculture as an inherently technological practice which is radically different from 'nature'; (2) the notions of control and manipulation which are central to the concept of hubris are difficult to understand and use in the context of agriculture; (3) trying to establish a prima facie reason against GM crops runs into serious difficulty since many GM crops are profoundly different from each other; and (4) even if we accept Sandler's argument of hubris, it actually plays no role in the reasoning and evaluation of the moral status of different GM crops.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Netherlands, 2015. Vol. 28, no 1, 161-177 p.
Virtue ethics, Hubris, Humility, Ronald Sandler, GM crops, Biotechnology, Agriculture
Research subject Philosophy
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-162135DOI: 10.1007/s10806-014-9526-7ISI: 000347889400010ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84922076287OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-162135DiVA: diva2:797157
FunderMistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
QC 201503242015-03-232015-03-232015-03-30Bibliographically approved