Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating ethical tools
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy. Mistra Biotech.
2015 (English)In: Metaphilosophy, ISSN 0026-1068, E-ISSN 1467-9973, Vol. 46, no 2, 263-279 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article reviews suggestions for how ethical tools are to be evaluated and argues that the concept of ethical soundness as presented by Kaiser etal. (2007) is unhelpful. Instead, it suggests that the quality of an ethical tool is determined by how well it achieves its assigned purpose(s). Those are different for different tools, and the article suggests a categorization of such tools into three groups. For all ethical tools, it identifies comprehensiveness and user-friendliness as crucial. For tools that have reaching a decision in a democratic context as a main purpose, it identifies transparency, guiding users toward a decision and justification of the decision-supporting mechanism. For tools that aim to engage the public, it identifies procedural fairness as essential. It also notes that the scope of use for ethical tools is limited to the same moral community, and that this feature is frequently overlooked.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 46, no 2, 263-279 p.
Keyword [en]
applied ethics, consensus conference, ethical matrix, ethical soundness, ethical tools
National Category
Ethics
Research subject
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-162137DOI: 10.1111/meta.12130ISI: 000352634300006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84927134161OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-162137DiVA: diva2:797162
Projects
Mistra Biotech
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Note

QC 20150508. Updated from accepted to published.

Available from: 2015-03-23 Created: 2015-03-23 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Ethical aspects of crop biotechnology in agriculture
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Ethical aspects of crop biotechnology in agriculture
2015 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis analyses a few selected aspects of crop biotechnology in agriculture. The thesis contains two essays; the first addresses the topic of how ethical tools can help to, especially in democratic societies, improve ethical judgments on modern biotechnologies used in agriculture and food production. The second essay explores GM crops and the question of whether engaging and promoting agriculture biotechnology would be an expression of hubris. Essay I discusses ethical tools and more specifically what makes a tool a good one. It is argued that some of the previous attempts of evaluating ethical tools are unfruitful. Myself and Per Sandin propose that ethical tools be divided into three categories with regard to their different aim(s). We suggest that the quality of an ethical tool is decided by its purposiveness, i.e. how well the tool achieves its assigned purpose(s). Essay II discusses the concept of hubris with regard to agricultural biotechnology. Several authors have claimed that supporting agricultural biotechnology is an expression of hubris. Ronald Sandler has given the argument its most structured account of yet. I argue that Sandler fails to establish a presumption against the use of GM crops and that the concept of hubris should play no role in evaluating GM crops and agricultural biotechnology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2015. 31 p.
Series
Theses in philosophy from the Royal Institute of Technology, ISSN 1650-8831
National Category
Ethics
Research subject
Philosophy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-162187 (URN)978-91-7595-504-9 (ISBN)
Presentation
2015-04-13, Seminar Room, Brinellvägen 32, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Projects
Mistra Biotech
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Note

QC 20150330

Available from: 2015-03-30 Created: 2015-03-23 Last updated: 2015-03-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Moula, Payam
By organisation
Philosophy
In the same journal
Metaphilosophy
Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 91 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf