Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Environmental effect analysis: how does the method stand in relation to lessons learned from the use of other design for environment methods
Högskolan i Kalmar.
2001 (English)In: Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 2001. Proceedings EcoDesign 2001: Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 2001, 864-869 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The paper presents Environmental Effect Analysis (EEA), which is a qualitative method for DfE. This method has been developed in close co-operation with the industry. The method is designed to be used in the early phases of product development and also considers the economical and technical aspects. The paper starts with a literature review of general lessons learned from the use of DfE methods. Then it gives a presentation of the EEA method. Finally the paper discusses the development in comparison to other DfE methods and describes experiences from the use of the EEA method

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2001. 864-869 p.
National Category
Other Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-5191DOI: 10.1109/.2001.992482ISBN: 0-7695-1266-6 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-5191DiVA: diva2:8004
Conference
EcoDesign, 11 dec 2001 - 15 dec 2001, Tokyo, Japan
Note
QC 20101021Available from: 2005-05-31 Created: 2005-05-31 Last updated: 2010-10-21Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Engineering Designers' Requirements on Design for Environment Methods and Tools
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Engineering Designers' Requirements on Design for Environment Methods and Tools
2005 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

Given a special focus on Design for Environment (DfE) methods and tools, the objectives of this thesis are to, “Identify basic design-related requirements that a method or tool should fulfill in order to become actively used by engineering designers”, and to “Investigate how those basic requirements could be used to make DfE methods and tools more actively used in industry among engineering designers”.

The research has shown that designers in general have three main purposes for utilizing methods and tools, of which the last two could be seen as subsets of the first one. The purposes are to: (1) facilitate various kinds of communication within the product development process; (2) integrate knowledge and experience into the methods and tools as a know-how backup; and (3) contribute with structure in the product development process. The low degree of follow-up implies a risk that methods and tools are used that affect the work within the company in a negative way. In order to be able to better follow-up methods and tools regarding both their utilization and usefulness, there is a need for a better definition of requirements for methods and tools.

Most of all designers’ related requirements are related to their’ aims to fulfill the product performance and keep down the development time. This can be concluded as four major requirements, that a DfE method or tool, as well as a common method or tool, must exhibit: (1) be easy to adopt and implement, (2) facilitate designers to fulfill specified requirements on the presumptive product, and at the same time (3) reduce the risk that important elements in the product development phase are forgotten. Both these two latter requirements relate to a method or tool’s degree of appropriateness. The second and the third requirements are related to the fourth requirement, which is found to be the most important: that the use of the method or tool (4) must reduce the total calendar time (from start to end) to solve the task. The conclusion is that DfE methods and tools must be designed to comply to a higher degree with the main users - in this case the designers’ requirements for methods and tools

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH, 2005. xiv, 74 p.
Series
Trita-MMK, ISSN 1400-1179 ; 2005:07
Keyword
Environmental technology, Design for Environment, Methods and Tools, Requirements, Miljöteknik
National Category
Other Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-236 (URN)91-7178-110-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2005-06-07, M3, Brinellvägen 64, Stockholm, 14:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Note
QC 20101021Available from: 2005-05-31 Created: 2005-05-31 Last updated: 2010-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindahl, Mattias
Other Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 92 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf