Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The future of software tool chain safety qualification
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Machine Design (Dept.), Mechatronics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5704-4504
2015 (English)In: Safety Science, ISSN 0925-7535, E-ISSN 1879-1042, Vol. 74, 37-43 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

High profile systemic safety standards for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) development within the transportation domain have commonalities with regard to their view of the safety-related implications of tool usage. Their guidelines on tool qualification favor a bottom-up approach in which tools are dealt with in isolation and mostly if they may directly introduce faults into end products. This guidance may ignore risk introduced by the integration of software tools, especially if these risks are related to low levels of automation - such as process notifications and improper graphical user interfaces. This paper presents a study that ties weaknesses in support environments to software faults. Based on the observed weaknesses guidelines for a top-down software tool chain qualification are suggested for inclusion in the next generation of safety standards. This has implications not only for the surveyed standards in the transportation domain, but also for other standards for safety-critical CPS development that do not include a broader view on risks related to tool usage. Furthermore, given the type of omission identified in the surveyed standards, it is suggested that researchers interested in the safety-related implications of tool integration should approach organizational research in search of possibilities to set up theory triangulation studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2015. Vol. 74, 37-43 p.
Keyword [en]
Automation, Certification, Tool qualification, Support environments, Tool integration
National Category
Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-163963DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.023ISI: 000350518200004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84918797132OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-163963DiVA: diva2:809845
Note

QC 20150505

Available from: 2015-05-05 Created: 2015-04-13 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2018-07-14 10:35
Available from 2018-07-14 10:35

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusSciencedirect

Authority records BETA

Asplund, Fredrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Asplund, Fredrik
By organisation
Mechatronics
In the same journal
Safety Science
Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 139 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf