Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Scheduling modern elevators: A comparison of the two algorithms FSO and FS4
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC).
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC).
2015 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Two of the most common elevator algorithms, FS4 and FSO, are discussed in this thesis. Their pros and cons regarding passenger waiting time and energy consumption are compared to find which of the algorithms perform best and what factors affect this. These topics are of interest for owners of modern building.By developing a simulation program the behavior of elevators controlled by these algorithms were simulated. Passenger pattern in the simulation was meant to emulate the pattern that occurs in office buildings at lunch hour.The conclusion is that due to differences in sector usage and specific rules for each algorithm they have different strengths concerning waiting time and energy consumption, but overall the FS4 is the stronger choice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
National Category
Computer Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-166717OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-166717DiVA: diva2:812034
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-05-15 Created: 2015-05-13 Last updated: 2015-05-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1670 kB)433 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1670 kBChecksum SHA-512
ff3a6a54c1ee28c4c49dd88a6d9da56d99e55595127a18aa7dadbe47c233318a98bc5f0b213f3e6218ce898351960c1994d8fd5d90d78e8812dc9e3bd70f29bf
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC)
Computer Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 433 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 524 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf