Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) in Airport Surface: Europe vs usa implementations, challenges and best practices
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Industrial Management.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6887-6859
2014 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study is to explore the current status and future challenges of Airport/Surface-Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) implementations, explain the diversity of experiences and different managerial approaches that are mediating in the implementation processes in Europe and the US and propose a framework of best practices for the future. This is done by comparing past historical, operational, and cost-benefit analysis approaches in both continents. The main differences in implementation processes are examined in order to identify common and differentiating aspects in terms of factors of influence. At the backdrop of this study, the authors recognize how many initiatives have been slowed down or stalled due to lack of agreement, communication, or accountability of the involved actors. In order to capture the varying outcomes of past experiences, his study has followed a multi-case study design methodology with various data sources. Findings show different perceptions on implementation factors and motivations for success in both continents, and also between different industries. Results show that a number of issues are inherent to the technological complexity and structural organizations in specific aerospace organizations, but some major aspects as communications, leadership, funding and operation maturity are common to all of them. Finally, a set of recommendations is proposed based on change management techniques to improve CDM implementation in the future.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. G21-F215 p.
Series
Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference, ICNS, ISSN 2155-4943 ; 6819989
Keyword [en]
Cost benefit analysis, Aerospace organizations, Airport surfaces, Change management, Collaborative decision making, Future challenges, Implementation process, Structural organization, Technological complexity, Decision making
National Category
Aerospace Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-167570DOI: 10.1109/ICNSurv.2014.6819989ISI: 000355752400013Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84902284107ISBN: 978-1-4799-4891-8 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-167570DiVA: diva2:816081
Conference
14th Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference, ICNS 2014, 8 April 2014 through 10 April 2014, Herndon, VA
Note

QC 20150602

Available from: 2015-06-02 Created: 2015-05-22 Last updated: 2017-05-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Okwir, Simon

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Okwir, Simon
By organisation
Industrial Management
Aerospace Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 70 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf