Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Educational use of Social Annotation Systems for Peer Feedback
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC), Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID. (Technology Enhanced Learning)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6457-5231
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC), Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID. (Technology Enhanced Learning)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2162-8353
2015 (English)In: KTH Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2015, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2015Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Social annotation systems provide a way for several students to annotate shared documents in an online environment (Novak, Razzouk & Johnson, 2012). We have for a number of years used social annotation systems in order to allow students to comment on each other's work, and have very positive experiences for using it in academic writing in bachelor theses (Hedin, 2012, Pargman, Hedin, Hrastinski, 2013). In this roundtable we present and demonstrate the method that is used, and add the experiences from using social annotation systems in two other courses, with more strict guidelines for what constitutes good feedback practice inspired by Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick (2006), and by De Bono’s Six thinking hats (De Bono, 1999). After introducing social annotation systems in bachelor thesis writing, the throughput has increased from 78% to almost 100%, even though a causal effect cannot be established. The attitudes of the students have been very positive, where both giving and receiving feedback to and from fellow students has been seen as activities well worth the effort. The feedback guidelines have increased the quality of the feedback given by freshmen students.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2015.
Keyword [en]
Social annotation systems, peer feedback, Technology Enhanced Learning
National Category
Media and Communication Technology
Research subject
Education and Communication in the Technological Sciences; Media Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-169061OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-169061DiVA: diva2:819450
Conference
KTH Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2015,12 of march 2015, Stockholm
Note

Qc 20150618

Available from: 2015-06-10 Created: 2015-06-10 Last updated: 2015-06-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(184 kB)58 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 184 kBChecksum SHA-512
7c50a56e2b5af3827458a9a077cd52be272f7b980432fb05409d5ad2f9883bc040ab75dd84618c2c8c19521203f361c6f3446f2d0f8eb14ebb04e8b0c445e9ed
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Conference website

Authority records BETA

Hedin, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hedin, BjörnPargman, Daniel
By organisation
Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID
Media and Communication Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 58 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 290 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf