Reply to "Comment on 'Coherent interference in the resonant dissociative electron attachment to carbon monoxide'"
2015 (English)In: Physical Review A. Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, ISSN 1050-2947, E-ISSN 1094-1622, Vol. 91, no 5, 056702Article in journal (Refereed) Published
We respond to Nag and Nandi's Comment on our paper [Phys. Rev. A 88, 012708 ( 2013)], in which the arguments arise from the data analyses of the angular distributions of O- produced in the dissociative electron attachments to CO at 10.5 or 10.6 eV although the same technique, anion-velocity time-sliced map imaging, was used. The forward distribution in the O- image observed by Nag and Nandi arises from the low momentum resolution and distortion in their ion velocity imaging measurements. These artifacts are due to their arbitrary elongation of the ion flight tube and the uncertainty in the size control of the reaction volume.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 91, no 5, 056702
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-169342DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.056702ISI: 000353877700005ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84929378496OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-169342DiVA: diva2:820770
QC 201506122015-06-122015-06-122015-06-12Bibliographically approved