Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Maximizing the probability of satisfying the clinical goals in radiation therapy treatment planning under setup uncertainty
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Mathematics (Dept.), Optimization and Systems Theory.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6252-7815
2015 (English)In: Medical physics (Lancaster), ISSN 0094-2405, Vol. 42, no 7, 3992-3999 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: This paper introduces a method that maximizes the probability of satisfying the clinical goals in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments subject to setup uncertainty. Methods: The authors perform robust optimization in which the clinical goals are constrained to be satisfied whenever the setup error falls within an uncertainty set. The shape of the uncertainty set is included as a variable in the optimization. The goal of the optimization is to modify the shape of the uncertainty set in order to maximize the probability that the setup error will fall within the modified set. Because the constraints enforce the clinical goals to be satisfied under all setup errors within the uncertainty set, this is equivalent to maximizing the probability of satisfying the clinical goals. This type of robust optimization is studied with respect to photon and proton therapy applied to a prostate case and compared to robust optimization using an a priori defined uncertainty set. Results: Slight reductions of the uncertainty sets resulted in plans that satisfied a larger number of clinical goals than optimization with respect to a priori defined uncertainty sets, both within the reduced uncertainty sets and within the a priori, nonreduced, uncertainty sets. For the prostate case, the plans taking reduced uncertainty sets into account satisfied 1.4 (photons) and 1.5 (protons) times as many clinical goals over the scenarios as the method taking a priori uncertainty sets into account. Conclusions: Reducing the uncertainty sets enabled the optimization to find better solutions with respect to the errors within the reduced as well as the nonreduced uncertainty sets and thereby achieve higher probability of satisfying the clinical goals. This shows that asking for a little less in the optimization sometimes leads to better overall plan quality.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 42, no 7, 3992-3999 p.
Keyword [en]
IMRT, IMPT, optimization, robustness, uncertainty
National Category
Other Medical Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-171901DOI: 10.1118/1.4921998ISI: 000357686400020PubMedID: 26133599ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84935005101OAI: diva2:845479

QC 20150812

Available from: 2015-08-12 Created: 2015-08-10 Last updated: 2015-08-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forsgren, Anders
By organisation
Optimization and Systems Theory
In the same journal
Medical physics (Lancaster)
Other Medical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 33 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link