Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Using PET/CT Bone Scan Dynamic Data to Evaluate Tibia Remodeling When a Taylor Spatial Frame Is Used: Short and Longer Term Differences
Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
KTH, School of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Communication Systems, CoS, Radio Systems Laboratory (RS Lab).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6066-746X
Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5870-2975
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: BioMed Research International, ISSN 2314-6133, E-ISSN 2314-6141, Vol. 2015, 1-11 p., 574705Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Eighteen consecutive patients, treated with a Taylor Spatial Frame for complex tibia conditions, gave their informed consentto undergo Na18Fβˆ’ PET/CT bone scans. We present a Patlak-like analysis utilizing an approximated blood time-activity curveeliminating the need for blood aliquots. Additionally, standardized uptake values (SUV) derived from dynamic acquisitions werecompared to this Patlak-like approach. Spherical volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn to include broken bone, other (normal)bone, and muscle. The SUVπ‘š(𝑑) (π‘š = max, mean) and a series of slopes were computed as (SUVπ‘š(𝑑𝑖) βˆ’ SUVπ‘š(𝑑𝑗))/(𝑑𝑖 βˆ’ 𝑑𝑗), forpairs of time values 𝑑𝑖 and 𝑑𝑗. A Patlak-like analysis was performed for the same time values by computing ((VOI𝑝(𝑑𝑖)/VOI𝑒(𝑑𝑖)) βˆ’(VOI𝑝(𝑑𝑗)/VOI𝑒(𝑑𝑗)))/(π‘‘π‘–βˆ’π‘‘π‘—), where p = broken bone, other bone, andmuscle and e = expected activity in aVOI. Paired comparisonsbetween Patlak-like and SUVπ‘š slopes showed good agreement by both linear regression and correlation coefficient analysis(π‘Ÿ = 84%, π‘Ÿπ‘  = 78%-SUVmax, π‘Ÿ = 92%, and π‘Ÿπ‘  = 91%-SUVmean), suggesting static scans could substitute for dynamic studies.Patlak-like slope differences of 0.1 minβˆ’1 or greater between examinations and SUVmax differences of ∼5 usually indicated goodremodeling progress, while negative Patlak-like slope differences of βˆ’0.06 minβˆ’1 usually indicated poor remodeling progress in thiscohort.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2015. Vol. 2015, 1-11 p., 574705
National Category
Orthopedics Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-173247DOI: 10.1155/2015/574705ISI: 000361696200001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-173247DiVA: diva2:852295
Note

QC 20150910

Available from: 2015-09-08 Created: 2015-09-08 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPublished version

Authority records BETA

Maguire Jr., Gerald Q.Jonsson, CathrineNoz, Marilyn E.Zeleznik, Michael P.Jacobsson, HansWeidenhielm, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Maguire Jr., Gerald Q.Jonsson, CathrineNoz, Marilyn E.Zeleznik, Michael P.Jacobsson, HansWeidenhielm, Lars
By organisation
Radio Systems Laboratory (RS Lab)
In the same journal
BioMed Research International
OrthopedicsRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 119 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf