Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Energy-saving pathway exploration of CCS integrated with solar energy: Literature research and comparative analysis
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Energy Conversion and Management, ISSN 0196-8904, E-ISSN 1879-2227, Vol. 102, 66-80 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

One of main technical barriers to a large-scale application of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is a significant amount of required energy, e.g., regeneration heat of solvent in the chemical absorption system. Thus, energy consumption and corresponding high operation cost become two primary challenges for the promotion of CCS technology. Meanwhile, energy from the solar source in various forms has already been successfully used as an effective alternative supply in the industrial section for drying, heating and even cooling. Thus, integrating solar energy utilization into the CCS process could be a reasonable option for a sustainable development. A comparative analysis of CCS integrated with solar energy was presented in this paper based on the existing researches. The current status on typical configuration structure, feature and energy-efficiency performance of integrating options is reviewed for post-combustion, pre-combustion and oxygen-combustion systems. Based on these typical CO2 capture systems, a theoretical analysis is conducted for an energy-efficient comparison. Then four typical structures of the post-combustion system, which are highlighted in the review, are chosen as comparative objects for energy-saving and techno-economic evaluation. The results show that systems with a solar-assisted thermal energy and power generation have comparative advantages in term of carbon emission intensity, but the economic cost is increased under the current conditions of the equipment price. Compared to that of baseline case, carbon emission intensity of the case integrated with solar Organic Rankine Cycle can be reduced with a maximum decline of 9.73%, meanwhile the levelized costs of electricity increases 0.01 USD/kW h correspondingly.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 102, 66-80 p.
Keyword [en]
CO2 capture, Post-combustion, Solar energy, Renewable energy
National Category
Energy Engineering Chemical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-173132DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.01.018ISI: 000358809400008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84947038085OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-173132DiVA: diva2:855048
Note

QC 20150918

Available from: 2015-09-18 Created: 2015-09-07 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tan, Yuting
By organisation
Energy Processes
In the same journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy EngineeringChemical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf