Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Automated bug assignment: Ensemble-based machine learning in large scale industrial contexts
Eriksson AB and Linköping University.
Lund University.
KTH, School of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Software and Computer systems, SCS. UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8457-4105
Linköping University.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, ISSN 1382-3256, E-ISSN 1573-7616, Vol. 21, no 4, 1533-1578 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Bug report assignment is an important part of software maintenance. In particular, incorrect assignments of bug reports to development teams can be very expensive in large software development projects. Several studies propose automating bug assignment techniques using machine learning in open source software contexts, but no study exists for large-scale proprietary projects in industry. The goal of this study is to evaluate automated bug assignment techniques that are based on machine learning classification. In particular, we study the state-of-the-art ensemble learner Stacked Generalization (SG) that combines several classifiers. We collect more than 50,000 bug reports from five development projects from two companies in different domains. We implement automated bug assignment and evaluate the performance in a set of controlled experiments. We show that SG scales to large scale industrial application and that it outperforms the use of individual classifiers for bug assignment, reaching prediction accuracies from 50 % to 89 % when large training sets are used. In addition, we show how old training data can decrease the prediction accuracy of bug assignment. We advice industry to use SG for bug assignment in proprietary contexts, using at least 2,000 bug reports for training. Finally, we highlight the importance of not solely relying on results from cross-validation when evaluating automated bug assignment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2016. Vol. 21, no 4, 1533-1578 p.
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-174595DOI: 10.1007/s10664-015-9401-9ISI: 000379060700004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84941356343OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-174595DiVA: diva2:877365
Note

QC 20160715

Available from: 2015-12-07 Created: 2015-10-07 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusPublished article at Springer link

Authority records BETA

Broman, David

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Broman, David
By organisation
Software and Computer systems, SCS
In the same journal
Journal of Empirical Software Engineering
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 207 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf