Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Promoting Planning for Housing Development: What can Sweden learn from Germany?
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Building and Real Estate Economics.
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-179408OAI: diva2:882960

QS 2015

Available from: 2015-12-16 Created: 2015-12-16 Last updated: 2015-12-16Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Institutional Prerequisites for Housing Development: A comparative study of Germany and Sweden
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Institutional Prerequisites for Housing Development: A comparative study of Germany and Sweden
2015 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The housing shortage in Swedish growth regions has been heatedly debated for a number of years. Extensive reform proposals have been made by market actors and academics. The former center–right government in power until 2014 emphasized reform of the urban planning process. The current “red–green” government has ongoing planning reform on its agenda, but has instead emphasized investment subsidies. In the debate, the German housing market has been put forward as a positive example.

This licentiate thesis compares the early stages of housing development in Germany and Sweden to find any differences that could provide interesting points of discussion related to further housing market reform in Sweden. As the scope of such an analysis could be very wide, this thesis is restricted to urban planning law and implementation, and to city initiatives to increase housing supply, including the affordable housing segment.

The first step of the research project was to identify the major problems related to Swedish planning law and its implementation and to map the current state of reform. The identified problems encompassed issues related to municipal strategies for housing construction, the urban planning process, the appeal process, areas classified as of national interest, regulations, development agreements, and municipal land allocation. The article “The Planning Process in Sweden: current debate and reform proposals” summarizes the government inquiries, bills, and reforms introduced to date and gives an outlook on possible future urban planning reform in light of recent political developments.

Second, the urban planning and appeal processes in Germany and Sweden were compared. The article “Promoting Planning for Housing Development: what can Sweden learn from Germany?” discusses three alternative processes in German local planning (i.e., private initiative, facilitated procedures in built-up areas, and omission of the local plan under certain circumstances) as well as the organization of planning authorities and city demands for affordable housing. The conclusion includes a proposal for a facilitated local housing plan, the introduction of private initiative in planning, and ways to improve planning authority organization in Sweden. When it comes to planning-related city demands for affordable housing, more research drawing on extensive international experience is required.

Third, city strategies for housing construction were compared in the article “City Strategies for Affordable Housing: the approaches of Berlin, Hamburg, Stockholm and Gothenburg.” Although the housing shortages in these four cities differ somewhat in structure, the tools for implementing housing policy related to construction are similar and address organization, urban planning, land allocation, and subsidies. The German cities have a more active housing policy, cooperating with developers and using tools more consistently, than do their Swedish counterparts. They are also more likely to reach their construction goals.

The overall findings of the research project stress the importance of political incentives in the formation of active housing policy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2015. 28 p.
, TRITA-FOB-LIC, 2016:1
housing, housing development, affordable housing, housing shortage, housing supply, urban planning, inclusionary zoning
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Research subject
Real Estate and Construction Management
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-179198 (URN)978-91-85783-55-7 (ISBN)
2016-01-14, Sal L1, Drottning Kristinas väg 30, KTH, Stockholm, 09:00 (English)
Security Link, H7863

QC 20151216

Available from: 2015-12-16 Created: 2015-12-11 Last updated: 2016-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Granath Hansson, Anna
By organisation
Building and Real Estate Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 59 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link