Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The governance gap surrounding phosphorus
Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden.
Stockholm Environment Institute, Swede.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9340-4391
2015 (English)In: Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, ISSN 1385-1314, E-ISSN 1573-0867Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There are gaps in the governance of phosphorus (P) across the value chain components (from “mine to fork”), within the monitoring and regulation of these components, and surrounding the role of stakeholders in the process. As a result the intrinsic objectives of a governance system for P are not well formulated and yet to be implemented. Phosphorus is a mineral and is produced and marketed much like other minerals. But since P is also an essential element in our food systems, critical for all forms of life and very dispersed in different products, it requires special attention concerning data collaboration especially regarding rock phosphate (RP) commercial reserves and potential resources. Policy leadership in this area is lacking and the world has no independent source of data or a governance system set up to provide independent monitoring of the knowledge and resource base. The science of P governance benefits from a review of how other minerals have been governed but also by taking a multi-level governance perspective to unpack the complexities. This study reviews key interacting factors affecting the need for governance including common perceptions surrounding P and fertilizers among producers and consumers, the highly skewed distribution of the global resource, the absence of the UN system in monitoring availability and consumption of RP resulting in uncertainty about the size of the commercial reserves, and the inefficiencies in various steps in the phosphate value chain from “mine to fork”. The paper provides an overview of governance opportunities including the realms of mining, agriculture and waste management, the respective parameters worth monitoring and regulating, the stakeholders involved and the associated objectives of the resulting improved governance. It provides some suggestions for policy priorities and a staged process of steps to achieve progress.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Netherlands, 2015.
National Category
Social and Economic Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-179468DOI: 10.1007/s10705-015-9747-9OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-179468DiVA: diva2:883353
Note

QC 20160125

Available from: 2015-12-17 Created: 2015-12-17 Last updated: 2016-01-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ekane, Nelson
In the same journal
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Social and Economic Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 7 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link