Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Why experience changes attitudes to congestion pricing: The case of Gothenburg
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Transport Science, Transport Planning, Economics and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9235-0232
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Transport Science, Transport Planning, Economics and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1789-9238
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Transport Science, Transport Planning, Economics and Engineering.
2016 (English)In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, ISSN 0965-8564, E-ISSN 1879-2375, Vol. 85, 1-16 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Many cities have seen public support for congestion charges increase substantially after charges have been introduced. Several alternative explanations of this phenomenon have been suggested, but so far little evidence has been available to assess the relative importance of these explanations. We study attitudes to congestion pricing in Gothenburg before and after congestion charges were introduced in January 2013. Attitudes to the charges did indeed become more positive after the introduction, just as in previous cities. Using a two-wave postal survey, we separate contributions to the attitude change from a number of sources: benefits and costs being different than anticipated, use of hypothecated revenues, reframing processes, and changes in related attitudes such as attitudes to environment, equity, taxation and pricing measures in general. We conclude that the dominant reason for the attitude change is status quo bias, rather than any substantial changes in beliefs or related attitudes, although some of these factors also contribute. Contrary to a common belief, nothing of the attitude change is due to benefits being larger than anticipated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2016. Vol. 85, 1-16 p.
Keyword [en]
Acceptability, Attitudes, Congestion pricing, Gothenburg
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-180905DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.002ISI: 000372942100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84953874723OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-180905DiVA: diva2:898704
Note

QC 20160129

Available from: 2016-01-29 Created: 2016-01-25 Last updated: 2016-04-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Börjesson, MariaEliasson, JonasJohnsson Hamilton, Carl
By organisation
Transport Planning, Economics and Engineering
In the same journal
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 256 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf