Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Blind people are more sensitive than sighted people to binaural sound-location cues, particularly inter-aural level differences
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC), Speech, Music and Hearing, TMH. Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
2016 (English)In: Hearing Research, ISSN 0378-5955, E-ISSN 1878-5891, Vol. 332, 223-232 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Blind people use auditory information to locate sound sources and sound-reflecting objects (echolocation). Sound source localization benefits from the hearing system's ability to suppress distracting sound reflections, whereas echolocation would benefit from "unsuppressing" these reflections. To clarify how these potentially conflicting aspects of spatial hearing interact in blind versus sighted listeners, we measured discrimination thresholds for two binaural location cues: inter-aural level differences (ILDs) and inter-aural time differences (ITDs). The ILDs or ITDs were present in single clicks, in the leading component of click pairs, or in the lagging component of click pairs, exploiting processes related to both sound source localization and echolocation. We tested 23 blind (mean age = 54 y), 23 sighted-age matched (mean age = 54 y), and 42 sighted-young (mean age = 26 y) listeners. The results suggested greater ILD sensitivity for blind than for sighted listeners. The blind group's superiority was particularly evident for ILD-lag-click discrimination, suggesting not only enhanced ILD sensitivity in general but also increased ability to unsuppress lagging clicks. This may be related to the blind person's experience of localizing reflected sounds, for which ILDs may be more efficient than ITDs. On the ITD-discrimination tasks, the blind listeners performed better than the sighted age-matched listeners, but not better than the sighted young listeners. ITD sensitivity declines with age, and the equal performance of the blind listeners compared to a group of substantially younger listeners is consistent with the notion that blind people's experience may offset age-related decline in ITD sensitivity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2016. Vol. 332, 223-232 p.
Keyword [en]
Sound localization, Echolocation, Precedence effect, Blind, Age
National Category
Neurosciences Otorhinolaryngology
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-185080DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.012ISI: 000371944200024PubMedID: 26433052ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84959079031OAI: diva2:919707

QC 20160414

Available from: 2016-04-14 Created: 2016-04-11 Last updated: 2016-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schenkman, Bo N.
By organisation
Speech, Music and Hearing, TMH
In the same journal
Hearing Research

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 6 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link