Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus
2016 (English)In: Journal of Informetrics, ISSN 1751-1577, E-ISSN 1875-5879, Vol. 10, no 2, 347-364 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Journal classification systems play an important role in bibliometric analyses. The two most important bibliographic databases, Web of Science and Scopus, each provide a journal classification system. However, no study has systematically investigated the accuracy of these classification systems. To examine and compare the accuracy of journal classification systems, we define two criteria on the basis of direct citation relations between journals and categories. We use Criterion I to select journals that have weak connections with their assigned categories, and we use Criterion II to identify journals that are not assigned to categories with which they have strong connections. If a journal satisfies either of the two criteria, we conclude that its assignment to categories may be questionable. Accordingly, we identify all journals with questionable classifications in Web of Science and Scopus. Furthermore, we perform a more in-depth analysis for the field of Library and Information Science to assess whether our proposed criteria are appropriate and whether they yield meaningful results. It turns out that according to our citation-based criteria Web of Science performs significantly better than Scopus in terms of the accuracy of its journal classification system.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2016. Vol. 10, no 2, 347-364 p.
Bibliographic database, Citation analysis, Journal classification system, Scopus, Web of Science
Computer and Information Science
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-186983DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.003ISI: 000377413800003ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84959513043OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-186983DiVA: diva2:930584
QC 201605242016-05-242016-05-162016-07-05Bibliographically approved