Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reflective Equilibrium Defended
Philosophy and History, KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1456-4352
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Reflective equilibrium is a method of justification in ethics. In this essay, I account for an argument against reflective equilibrium put forth by Theo van Willigenburg from a position of (weak) foundationalism. I attempt to demonstrate why it is flawed and how reflective equilibrium as a method of justification can withstand the foundationalist critique.

Keyword [en]
reflective equilibrium, justification
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-188131OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-188131DiVA: diva2:933508
Note

Unsubmitted manuscript. QCR 20160615

Available from: 2016-06-06 Created: 2016-06-06 Last updated: 2016-06-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ahlin, Jesper
By organisation
Philosophy
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 79 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf