Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Om kvalitetsbedömning i arkitektur
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Architecture. (arc@plan)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9715-9656
2007 (Swedish)In: Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift, ISSN 1403-3216, E-ISSN 2000-8325, Vol. 9, no 1, 23-42 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article has two aims. On the one hand, I want to clarify the use of architectural quality as a key concept used by architects. That is, I want to look at this notion from a professional perspective. The use of quality terms, the design, and the way architecture is judged all depend on one another. On the other hand, I examine how architectural quality is tested for and verified in practice. As a typical example, I look at how a jury in an architectural competition arrives at a decision on a winning entry. The jury has to identify the best solution for the task-a prize-winning design -and only one entry can be chosen. In the decision-making process, quality is strongly connected with values, and behind this thinking lays the assumption that good and bad solutions are manifest in the design. The assumption by the architects, again, is that a professional eye can detect quality in a design.

 

Seventeen professionals with first-hand competition experience were interviewed for this research. Among them were representatives of an architect's organization, the competition organizers, and the competitors. These interviewees were selected based on their professional expertise and skill in judging architectural competition entries.

 

From the interviews, we gain a good picture of how the concept of quality in design is understood in practice. The concept has different meanings, and appears to be ambiguous and even confusing. As is typical of practitioners, professional architects combine an aesthetic and artistic perspective with technical and practical points of view.  We see a genuine uncertainty prevailing in the field of architectural design: there is no single answer to the questions of architectural quality issues, but instead, in architectural and urban design proposals there are always several good solutions to be recognized.

 

In architectural competitions, the jury's task is to select the best proposal among the entries submitted--and to single out one winner. Disagreement over the final decision is seen as a failure for the jury. In case of divergence of opinion among the jury members, the competition might result in that the winning entry is not built. Competence and consensus are therefore two key factors in making the jury feel comfortable with the final selection of winners in architectural competitions. Consequently, the architects sitting in a jury must be professionals, with a good judgment in quality issues. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Borås, 2007. Vol. 9, no 1, 23-42 p.
Keyword [en]
Architecture, Architectural competition, Architectural quality, Quality issues, Quality judgment, Judgment practice
National Category
Architecture
Research subject
Architecture
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-188617OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-188617DiVA: diva2:937433
Note

QC 20160621

Available from: 2016-06-15 Created: 2016-06-15 Last updated: 2017-11-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(409 kB)21 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 409 kBChecksum SHA-512
fcf29ca5a571218f9e062c22473a5c79d89b201a21cf744b8673578f1751688839e01d604152cf9fda37bbc8d937ba652737331c768b62c32961fe8f29045182
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rönn, Magnus
By organisation
Architecture
In the same journal
Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift
Architecture

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 21 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 61 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf