Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Integrated Economic and Environmental Assessment of Waste Policy Instruments
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5535-6368
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Sustainability, ISSN 2071-1050, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 8, no 5, 411Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

The need for new policy instruments supporting the on-going transition from end-of-pipe waste treatment to resource management has been recognized in European policy. Instruments need to be carefully assessed before implementation to promote the desired changes and avoid problem shifting. Mathematical models may assist policy makers in such assessments. This paper presents a set of soft-linked models for assessing the economic and environmental impacts of policy instruments for both the prevention and management of waste and discusses its strengths and limitations. Consisting of (1) a macro-economic model, (2) a systems engineering model for waste management and (3) a life cycle assessment model for waste management, the set is primarily suited to assessing market-based instruments and environmental regulations. Considerable resources were needed for developing and using the set, and there are clear limits as to what can be addressed. However, if only one of the models had been used, neither the range of instruments nor the scope of impacts would have been possible to cover. Furthermore, soft-linked models allow many disciplines to contribute within one harmonized framework. Such integrated assessments may become increasingly useful for continuing the implementation of policy for sustainable governance of society's material resources.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 8, no 5, 411
Keyword [en]
waste policy, waste prevention, waste management, CGE models, systems engineering models, life cycle assessment, life cycle sustainability analysis
National Category
Civil Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-189823DOI: 10.3390/su8050411ISI: 000377983800005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84970990714OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-189823DiVA: diva2:949383
Note

QC 20160719

Available from: 2016-07-19 Created: 2016-07-15 Last updated: 2016-07-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Björklund, AnnaFinnveden, GöranArushanyan, Yevgeniya
By organisation
Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering
In the same journal
Sustainability
Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 89 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf