Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Evaluation of a versatile energy auditing tool
University of Innsbruck.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Fluid and Climate Technology. Högskolan Dalarna.
University of Innsbruck.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Fluid and Climate Technology.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)Conference paper, Abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Energy auditing can be an important contribution for identification and assessment of energy conservation measures (ECMs) in buildings. Numerous tools and software have been developed, with varying degree of precision and complexity and different areas of use.

 

This paper evaluates PHPP as a versatile, easy-to-use energy auditing tool and gives examples of how it has been compared to a dynamic simulation tool, within the EU-project iNSPiRe. PHPP is a monthly balance energy calculation tool based on EN13790. It is intended for assisting the design of Passive Houses and energy renovation projects and as guidance in the choice of appropriate ECMs.

 

PHPP was compared against the transient simulation software TRNSYS for a single family house and a multi-family house. It should be mentioned that dynamic building simulations might strongly depend on the model assumptions and simplifications compared to reality, such as ideal heating or real heat emission system. Setting common boundary conditions for both PHPP and TRNSYS, the ideal heating and cooling loads and demands were compared on monthly and annual basis for seven European locations and buildings with different floor area, S/V ratio, U-values and glazed area of the external walls.

 

The results show that PHPP can be used to assess the heating demand of single-zone buildings and the reduction of heating demand with ECMs with good precision. The estimation of cooling demand is also acceptable if an appropriate shading factor is applied in PHPP. In general, PHPP intentionally overestimates heating and cooling loads, to be on the safe side for system sizing. Overall, the agreement with TRNSYS is better in cases with higher quality of the envelope as in cold climates and for good energy standards. As an energy auditing tool intended for pre-design it is a good, versatile and easy-to-use alternative to more complex simulation tools.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
Keyword [en]
Energy auditing tool, energy conservation, building simulation, PHPP, TRNSYS
National Category
Energy Systems Interaction Technologies
Research subject
Civil and Architectural Engineering; Energy Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-189981OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-189981DiVA: diva2:949956
Conference
IAQVEC 2016, Seoul, Sydkorea
Projects
iNSPiRe
Funder
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 314461
Available from: 2016-07-26 Created: 2016-07-26 Last updated: 2016-08-10

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gustafsson, Marcus
By organisation
Fluid and Climate Technology
Energy SystemsInteraction Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 17 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link