Research gaps in the philosophy of evidence-based medicine
2016 (English)In: Philosophy Compass, ISSN 1747-9991, E-ISSN 1747-9991, 1-15 p.Article in journal (Refereed) In press
Increasing philosophical attention is being directed to the rapidly growing discipline of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Philosophical discussions of EBM, however, remain narrowly focused on randomization, mechanisms, and the sociology of EBM. Other aspects of EBM have been all but ignored, including (a) the nature of clinical reasoning and the question of whether it can be standardized; (b) the application of EBM principles to the logic, value, and ethics of diagnosis and prognosis; (c) evidence synthesis (systematic reviews and meta-analyses); and (d) the nature and ethics of placebo controls. Philosophical analysis in each of these areas has the potential to enhance the discussion of EBM methodology and practice.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2016. 1-15 p.
Philosophy of Evidence-Based Medicine, Medical Epistemology, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Clinical Trials, Mechanisms, Medical Technology, Placebo, Systematic Reviews
Philosophy Clinical Medicine Medical Biotechnology Health Sciences
Research subject Philosophy; Medical Technology
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-192005DOI: 10.1111/phc3_12352OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-192005DiVA: diva2:957782
FunderEU, European Research Council, 639276
QC 201609232016-09-052016-09-052016-09-23Bibliographically approved