Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Perceptual and Acoustic Analyses of Good Voice Quality in Male Radio Performers
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC), Speech, Music and Hearing, TMH, Music Acoustics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3362-7518
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Journal of Voice, ISSN 0892-1997, E-ISSN 1873-4588, Vol. 31, no 2, 259.e1-259.e12 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives

Good voice quality is an asset to professional voice users, including radio performers. We examined whether (1) voices could be reliably categorized as good for the radio and (2) these categories could be predicted using acoustic measures.

Participants and Methods

Male radio performers (n = 24) and age-matched male controls performed “The Rainbow Passage” as if presenting on the radio. Voice samples were rated using a three-stage paired-comparison paradigm by 51 naive listeners and perceptual categories were identified (Study 1), and then analyzed for fundamental frequency, long-term average spectrum, cepstral peak prominence, and pause or spoken-phrase duration (Study 2).

Results

Study 1: Good inter-judge reliability was found for perceptual judgments of the best 15 voices (good for radio category, 14/15 = radio performers), but agreement on the remaining 33 voices (unranked category) was poor. Study 2: Discriminant function analyses showed that the SD standard deviation of sounded portion duration, equivalent sound level, and smoothed cepstral peak prominence predicted membership of categories with moderate accuracy (R2 = 0.328).

Conclusions

Radio performers are heterogeneous for voice quality; good voice quality was judged reliably in only 14 out of 24 radio performers. Current acoustic analyses detected some of the relevant signal properties that were salient in these judgments. More refined perceptual analysis and the use of other perceptual methods might provide more information on the complex nature of judging good voices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2017. Vol. 31, no 2, 259.e1-259.e12 p.
Keyword [en]
voice, performance, supranormal, broadcaster, perceptual analysis
National Category
Media and Communication Technology
Research subject
Speech and Music Communication
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-192321DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.016Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85006817447OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-192321DiVA: diva2:967653
Note

QC 20160929

Available from: 2016-09-09 Created: 2016-09-09 Last updated: 2017-04-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ternström, Sten
By organisation
Music Acoustics
In the same journal
Journal of Voice
Media and Communication Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf