Endre søk
Begrens søket
1 - 17 of 17
RefereraExporteraLink til resultatlisten
Permanent link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Treff pr side
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sortering
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Forfatter A-Ø
  • Forfatter Ø-A
  • Tittel A-Ø
  • Tittel Ø-A
  • Type publikasjon A-Ø
  • Type publikasjon Ø-A
  • Eldste først
  • Nyeste først
  • Skapad (Eldste først)
  • Skapad (Nyeste først)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Eldste først)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyeste først)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidligste først)
  • Disputationsdatum (siste først)
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Forfatter A-Ø
  • Forfatter Ø-A
  • Tittel A-Ø
  • Tittel Ø-A
  • Type publikasjon A-Ø
  • Type publikasjon Ø-A
  • Eldste først
  • Nyeste først
  • Skapad (Eldste først)
  • Skapad (Nyeste først)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Eldste først)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyeste først)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidligste først)
  • Disputationsdatum (siste først)
Merk
Maxantalet träffar du kan exportera från sökgränssnittet är 250. Vid större uttag använd dig av utsökningar.
  • 1.
    Hansson, Sven Ove
    et al.
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Alternativ till pseudovetenskap2009Bok (Annet vitenskapelig)
  • 2.
    Hansson, Sven Ove
    et al.
    Filosofi och historia, KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Jerkert, JesperFilosofi och historia, KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Vetenskap eller villfarelse2005Collection/Antologi (Annet (populærvitenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 3.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för elektro- och systemteknik (EES), Ljud- och bildbehandling (Stängd 130101).
    Europarådet gör skarp markering mot kreationism2007Inngår i: Läkartidningen, ISSN 0023-7205, E-ISSN 1652-7518, Vol. 104, nr 43, s. 3216-Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
  • 4.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Flum i riksdagen 2010-20142014Inngår i: SANS, ISSN 2000-9690, nr 3, s. 28-32Artikkel i tidsskrift (Annet vitenskapelig)
  • 5.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Från ad hoc till önsketänkande: En guide till pseudovetenskapens värld2012 (oppl. 1)Bok (Annet (populærvitenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 6.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Negative mechanistic reasoning in medical intervention assessment2015Inngår i: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, ISSN 1386-7415, E-ISSN 1573-0980, Vol. 36, nr 6, s. 425-437Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    Traditionally, mechanistic reasoning has been assigned a negligible role in standard EBM (evidence-based medicine) literature, although some recent authors have argued for an upgrading. Even so, mechanistic reasoning that has received attention has almost exclusively been positive – both in an epistemic sense of claiming that there is a mechanistic chain and in a health-related sense of there being claimed benefits for the patient. Negative mechanistic reasoning has been neglected, both in the epistemic and in the health-related sense. I distinguish three main types of negative mechanistic reasoning and subsume them under a new definition of mechanistic reasoning in the context of assessing medical interventions. This definition is wider than a previous suggestion in the literature. Each negative type corresponds to a range of evidential strengths, and it is argued that there are differences with respect to the typical evidential strengths. The variety of negative mechanistic reasoning should be acknowledged in EBM, and presents a serious challenge to proponents of so-called medical hierarchies of evidence.

  • 7.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Om valkretsstorlekars spärreffekterManuskript (preprint) (Annet (populærvitenskap, debatt, mm))
    Abstract [en]

    In the absence of formal thresholds for representation, the constituency size will determine the effective threshold. In Swedish municipality elections there are (as of 2014) no formal thresholds, but the constituency sizes vary considerably. This note mainly presents the two mathematical formulas of interest for the calculation of effective thresholds. The voting share needed to get one seat under maximally charitable conditions (with respect to the distribution of votes among the other parties) is given by equation (7), where d is the first divisor (currently set to 1.4 in the Swedish system), M is the number of seats, and n is the number of parties. The voting share needed to be guaranteed to have one seat is given by equation (13). There is a threshold in between these extremes, a threshold at which there is a 50 % probability of winning one seat and a 50 % probability of winning none. For sufficiently large values of M, it is reasonable to believe that equation (5) provides a good approximation for the 50 % probability threshold.

  • 8.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    peer review2016Annet (Annet vitenskapelig)
    Abstract [sv]

    Artikel för Nationalencyklopedin som förklarar vad peer review är och hur det fungerar.

  • 9.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Philosophical Issues in Medical Intervention Research2015Licentiatavhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
    Abstract [en]

    The thesis consists of an introduction and two papers. In the introduction a brief historical survey of empirical investigations into the effectiveness of medicinal interventions is given. Also, the main ideas of the EBM (evidence-based medicine) movement are presented. Both included papers can be viewed as investigations into the reasonableness of EBM and its hierarchies of evidence.

    Paper I: Typically, in a clinical trial patients with specified symptoms are given either of two or more predetermined treatments. Health endpoints in these groups are then compared using statistical methods. Concerns have been raised, not least from adherents of so-called alternative medicine, that clinical trials do not offer reliable evidence for some types of treatment, in particular for highly individualized treatments, for example traditional homeopathy. It is argued that such concerns are unfounded. There are two minimal conditions related to the nature of the treatments that must be fulfilled for evaluability in a clinical trial, namely (1) the proper distinction of the two treatment groups and (2) the elimination of confounding variables or variations. These are delineated, and a few misunderstandings are corrected. It is concluded that the conditions do not preclude the testing of alternative medicine, whether individualized or not.

    Paper II: Traditionally, mechanistic reasoning has been assigned a negligible role in standard EBM literature, although some recent authors have argued for an upgrading. Even so, mechanistic reasoning that has received attention has almost exclusively been positive -- both in an epistemic sense of claiming that there is a mechanistic chain and in a health-related sense of there being claimed benefits for the patient. Negative mechanistic reasoning has been neglected, both in the epistemic and in the health-related sense. I distinguish three main types of negative mechanistic reasoning and subsume them under a new definition of mechanistic reasoning in the context of assessing medical interventions. Although this definition is wider than a previous suggestion in the literature, there are still other instances of reasoning that concern mechanisms but do not (and should not) count as mechanistic reasoning. One of the three distinguished types, which is negative only in the health-related sense, has a corresponding positive counterpart, whereas the other two, which are epistemically negative, do not have such counterparts, at least not that are particularly interesting as evidence. Accounting for negative mechanistic reasoning in EBM is therefore partly different from accounting for positive mechanistic reasoning. Each negative type corresponds to a range of evidential strengths, and it is argued that there are differences with respect to the typical strengths. The variety of negative mechanistic reasoning should be acknowledged in EBM, and presents a serious challenge to proponents of so-called medical hierarchies of evidence.

  • 10.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    Filosofi och historia, KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Review of Enharmonic Instruments and Music 1470–1900 by Patrizio Barbieri2010Inngår i: Svensk tidskrift för musikforskning, ISSN 0081-9816, Vol. 92, s. 121-123Artikkel, omtale (Annet vitenskapelig)
  • 11.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Science in the Age of Computer Simulation, by Eric Winsberg2012Inngår i: Theoria, ISSN 0040-5825, E-ISSN 1755-2567, Vol. 78, nr 2, s. 168-175Artikkel, omtale (Annet vitenskapelig)
  • 12.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    Filosofi och historia, KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Scientific Theory and Practice: Six Introductory Texts2017 (oppl. 1)Bok (Annet vitenskapelig)
  • 13.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Medicine2013Inngår i: Theoria, ISSN 0040-5825, E-ISSN 1755-2567, Vol. 79, nr 2, s. 180-186Artikkel, omtale (Annet vitenskapelig)
  • 14.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    The two months argument for parapsychological research2007Inngår i: Skeptical Inquirer, ISSN 0194-6730, nr 4, s. 62-64Artikkel i tidsskrift (Annet (populærvitenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 15.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Varför åberopar man inte det övernaturliga i vetenskapen?2011Inngår i: Filosofisk Tidskrift, ISSN 0348-7482, nr 4, s. 41-49Artikkel i tidsskrift (Annet (populærvitenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 16.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Why alternative medicine can be scientifically evaluated: Countering the evasions of pseudoscience2013Inngår i: Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem / [ed] Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013, s. 305-320Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    Typically, in a clinical trial patients with specified symptoms are given either of two predetermined treatments. Health endpoints in the two groups are then compared using statistical methods. Concerns have been raised, not least from adherents of so-called alternative medicine, that clinical trials do not offer reliable evidence for some types of treatment, in particular for highly individualized treatments, for example traditional homeopathy. It is argued that such concerns are unfounded. There are two minimal conditions related to the nature of the treatments that must be fulfilled for eligibility to a clinical trial, namely (1) the proper distinction of the two treatment groups and (2) the elimination of confounding variables or variations. These are delineated, and a few misunderstandings are corrected. It is concluded that the conditions do not preclude the testing of alternative medicine, whether individualized or not.

  • 17.
    Jerkert, Jesper
    et al.
    Filosofi och historia, KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    Hansson, Sven Ove
    Filosofi och historia, KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.
    A Swedish Professorship in Parapsychology2006Inngår i: Skeptical Inquirer, ISSN 0194-6730, nr 4, s. 8-Artikkel i tidsskrift (Annet vitenskapelig)
1 - 17 of 17
RefereraExporteraLink til resultatlisten
Permanent link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf