Change search
Refine search result
1 - 3 of 3
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Kytömäki, Olli
    KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Construction and Facilities Management.
    An operationalizable definition and method for research on innovation ecosystemsManuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The concept of innovation ecosystem has attracted much research in strategy and innovation fields in recent years. The expansion of literature without common definitions or methodology has caused ambiguity about what innovation ecosystems are about. Recently, several authors have criticized the conceptual and methodological rigor in innovation ecosystems research and called for research focusing on the systemic nature of innovation ecosystems.

    This paper builds on these critical accounts by providing an operationalizable definition of innovation ecosystem: a system of actors that contribute towards a common system-level innovation goal. Based on this definition, the paper provides a methodological approach that quantifies qualitative data and then analyses that quantitative data by social network analysis. This method is used for multi-level, multi-layer ecosystem analysis. The definition and methodology are operationalized in a study of innovation ecosystem in the real estate sector.

  • 2.
    Kytömäki, Olli
    KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Construction and Facilities Management.
    Digitalization and innovation in the real estate and facility management sectors - an ecosystem perspective2020Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Digitalization has become a topic of several presentations and discussions in real estate industry seminars in recent years. Often the speeches are about why the real estate industry needs digitalization, presenting threats and opportunities for the participants of the seminars. Still, real estate industry is conservative by nature and thus far property owners have not needed to innovate in order to stay in business. Therefore, a question arises that how do real estate owners react to the growing expectations about digitalization. On the other hand, relatively little is known about the innovativeness of real estate firms, as innovation research in built environment sector has largely focused on building project management phase organizations and facility management firms. Still, the real estate owners have a central role and a long-term perspective on the innovation in the built environment sector as a whole, as they are clients in all building life-cycle phases.

    Thus, this thesis purpose is to increase understanding of digitalization as a phenomenon in the real estate and facility management sectors: 1) by distinguishing the phenomenon in relation to existing research and 2) by generating new knowledge on digitalization in the field by explorative research.

    In order to distinguish the phenomenon in relation to existing research, the thesis provides a structured literature review that focuses on digitalization in the real estate and facility management sector. The main conclusion is that digitalization is a complex phenomenon, including multiple perspectives and conceptualizations, although, the literature converges on rather distinct topics of digital systems and methods, technology adoption and organization and management. Additionally, the review provides a discussion of opportunities for further research. An argument is made for sociotechnical perspective to provide opportunities for better managerial comprehension on the complex phenomenon.

    In order to generate new knowledge on digitalization in the field, particularly, on the innovativeness of real estate firms, the thesis provides summaries of two papers. The first paper focuses on the innovation processes in the real estate owner organizations and the second paper focuses on the innovation ecosystem that comprises of actors that contribute towards common innovation goals. The papers are based on interviews with the various real estate industry actors and document analysis. The papers converge on results, concluding that the real estate owners have invested in resources and capabilities for innovation, but it is still challenging for them to act on the digital threats and opportunities. Additionally, the second paper develops an operationalizable definition and methodology for research on innovation ecosystems, which has relevance for the more general literature on innovation and strategy.

    Thus, this thesis distinguishes digitalization as a phenomenon in the built environment management sectors and increases understanding on the innovativeness of real estate firms’ and other actors that contribute to the innovativeness of the real estate sector as a whole.

  • 3.
    Kytömäki, Olli
    et al.
    KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Construction and Facilities Management.
    Kadefors, Anna
    Digitalization and innovation in the real estate sector2018Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Recently, digitalization has emerged as a main theme in the industry discourse in the real estate sector. In this discourse, some influencers foresee that digitalization poses disruption, even an existential threat, to the traditional actors, which are expected to make “digital transformations” to remain relevant. Others emphasize the potential of digitalization to drive efficiency, sustainability and servitization of the industry. However, the real estate sector is a mature business environment with a low rate of innovation and limited R&D resources, and it is not evident how this traditional sector reacts to the multitude of new predictions and propositions. Based on theories of innovation management, this study investigates real estate owners’ sense-making and strategizing in this area: how do they seek information and prioritize which initiatives to take? Which actions are taken? How are structures for innovation management affected, within firms as well as on the industry level? The results are based on semi- structured interviews conducted with respondents responsible for digital development in large private and public real estate owners in Sweden, as well as with representatives of industry associations. Findings include that real estate firms and industry associations emphasize digitalization-related opportunities to improve efficiency and tenant satisfaction, as well as to create new services and business models. Also, real estate firms perceive that change is needed to remain competitive, and as a response, they have created digitalization strategies, formed new organizational units and recruited new people to lead digitalization efforts. Further, they have established new collaborative relationships to industry networks and competitors.

1 - 3 of 3
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf