kth.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Danielsson, ChristinaORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-2432-7617
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 44) Show all publications
Angelaki, S. (2025). Activity-based lighting for schools: A design handbook. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Activity-based lighting for schools: A design handbook
2025 (English)Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
Abstract [en]

This design handbook outlines proposed steps and phases of analysis for classroom activities. The goal is to understand and create a basis for practicioners working with educational facilities regarding lighting design directions, concepts, and criteria. This work explores and presents a design process leading to lighting scenarios based on classroom activities for primary school pupils. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2025. p. 32
National Category
Architecture
Research subject
Architecture, Architectural Design
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-360348 (URN)10.5281/zenodo.14918184 (DOI)
Note

QC 20250226

Available from: 2025-02-25 Created: 2025-02-25 Last updated: 2025-02-26Bibliographically approved
Angelaki, S., Frelin, A., Grannäs, J., Besenecker, U. & Danielsson, C. (2024). Methods for inclusive design processes at the early stages of a research project in School Environments. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science: . Paper presented at Light Symposium 2023: Architecture Lighting Environments - Space With(Out) Light, 4-6 December 2023, Stockholm, Sweden. IOP Publishing, Article ID 012027.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Methods for inclusive design processes at the early stages of a research project in School Environments
Show others...
2024 (English)In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing , 2024, article id 012027Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper explores the use of participatory methods prior to designing interventions within a research project at a primary school in central Sweden. The approach presented in the paper is based on the principles of participatory design (PD), to enhance the use of these methods within the areas of educational research (ER), lighting, and architecture. This approach aims to include participants of educational spaces and incorporate their views prior to design interventions. Two workshops were designed to support teachers' participation through hands-on activities. Twenty-eight teachers participated in the workshops. Scale models corresponding to two of the school's classrooms were used to initiate discussions regarding the interconnection between spatial layouts, lighting, and learning activities. The workshops' data collection analysis assisted the research group in understanding the school's spatial and learning characteristics. The information gathered from the workshops provided additional knowledge and informed the research project in a way that allowed for further development and changes within the project related to the additional variables measured along with light. According to the analysis, there is a correlation between the activity and the desired layout of the space, while the type of equipment also varies according to the task. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOP Publishing, 2024
Series
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, ISSN 1755-1307, E-ISSN 1755-1315
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-345850 (URN)10.1088/1755-1315/1320/1/012027 (DOI)2-s2.0-85190466058 (Scopus ID)
Conference
Light Symposium 2023: Architecture Lighting Environments - Space With(Out) Light, 4-6 December 2023, Stockholm, Sweden
Available from: 2024-04-22 Created: 2024-04-22 Last updated: 2025-10-27Bibliographically approved
Danielsson, C. & Theorell, T. (2024). Office Design’s Impact on Psychosocial Work Environment and Emotional Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(4), Article ID 438.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Office Design’s Impact on Psychosocial Work Environment and Emotional Health
2024 (English)In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, ISSN 1661-7827, E-ISSN 1660-4601, Vol. 21, no 4, article id 438Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study explores the association between office design and (a) the psychosocial work environment and (b) the emotional health among 4352 employees in seven different office designs. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed with adjustments for age and educational level for men and women separately. Results show that psychosocial factors and emotional exhaustion differ between both office designs and between genders, with best outcomes in cell offices, except for psychological demands that are rated the most favourable in shared-room offices. Cell offices and small open-plan offices show a strong beneficial association with emotional exhaustion in women. Among men, hot-desking is most problematic regarding psychosocial work environment and emotional exhaustion. Women rate the psychosocial environment low in combi-office and report emotional exhaustion in small open offices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG, 2024
Keywords
emotional exhaustion, emotional health, gender, Job Demand–Control–Support model, office design, office work environment, psychosocial work environment, social health
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-346397 (URN)10.3390/ijerph21040438 (DOI)38673349 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85191308820 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20240516

Available from: 2024-05-14 Created: 2024-05-14 Last updated: 2024-05-16Bibliographically approved
Angelaki, S., Besenecker, U. & Danielsson, C. (2022). A review of lighting research in educational spaces. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Paper presented at 8th International Light Symposium: Re-thinking Lighting Design in a Sustainable Future, LS 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-23 September 2022. IOP Publishing, 1099(1), Article ID 012032.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A review of lighting research in educational spaces
2022 (English)In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing , 2022, Vol. 1099, no 1, article id 012032Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The present paper summarises tendencies related to research in lighting for school environments from 1980 to 2020. Methods and tools used to evaluate and analyse both daylight and electric lighting are presented. The studies in this literature review were grouped in four decades and are presented chronologically. The review suggests a shift from on-site evaluations in the early decades, both when using qualitative and quantitative research methods, to software-based research and analysis in more recent studies. during the past decade, there appears to be a general increase in both software and user-based techniques for evaluation and design of educational spaces. However, it is interesting that the lighting layout in classrooms does not show significant changes during the four decades since it follows the same grid pattern regardless of the changes in architectural, design and teaching tendencies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOP Publishing, 2022
National Category
Architectural Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-329609 (URN)10.1088/1755-1315/1099/1/012032 (DOI)2-s2.0-85143206546 (Scopus ID)
Conference
8th International Light Symposium: Re-thinking Lighting Design in a Sustainable Future, LS 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-23 September 2022
Note

QC 20230622

Available from: 2023-06-22 Created: 2023-06-22 Last updated: 2023-06-22Bibliographically approved
Bodin Danielsson, C. & Hoy, S. (2022). Health-Supportive Office Design-It Is Chafing Somewhere: Where and Why?. Sustainability, 14(19), 12504, Article ID 12504.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Health-Supportive Office Design-It Is Chafing Somewhere: Where and Why?
2022 (English)In: Sustainability, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 14, no 19, p. 12504-, article id 12504Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This explorative case study investigates health-promoting office design from an experience and meaning-making perspective in an activity-based flex-office (A-FO) in a headquarter building. This small case study (n = 11) builds using qualitative data (walk-through and focus group interviews). A reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) of the experience of design approach was performed on this from a health and sustainability perspective, including the physical, mental, and social dimensions of health defined by WHO. Results show a wide range in participants' experiences and meaning-making of the health-promoting office design of their office building. The control aspect plays a central role in participants' experiences, including factors such as surveillance and obeyance, related to status and power, in turn associated with experiences of pleasantness, symbolism, and inclusiveness. Three main themes are identified in participants' experiences: (1) comfort-non-comfort, (2) outsider-insider, and (3) symbolism. The major finding of the study is the ambiguity among participants about the health-supportive office design of the office building per se and its various environments. There is a sense that it is chafing, due to dissonance between the intention of the office and the applied design.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG, 2022
Keywords
sustainable office, symbolic design, health-promoting design, dimensions of health, meaning-making, walk-through interviews, reflexive thematic analysis (RTA)
National Category
Architecture Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-320690 (URN)10.3390/su141912504 (DOI)000867147300001 ()2-s2.0-85139905130 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20221031

Available from: 2022-10-31 Created: 2022-10-31 Last updated: 2025-02-24Bibliographically approved
Backlander, G., Falten, R., Bodin Danielsson, C., Toivanen, S. & Richter, A. (2021). Development and Validation of a Multi-Dimensional Measure of Activity-Based Working Behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID 655881.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Development and Validation of a Multi-Dimensional Measure of Activity-Based Working Behaviors
Show others...
2021 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 12, article id 655881Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Most work on activity-based working centers on the physical environment and digital technologies enabling flexible working. While important, we believe the key components for implementing activity-based working are employee and manager behaviors. To measure the degree of enactment of activity-based work, based on workshops with experienced practitioners as well as previous literature, we have developed and validated a behavior-focused measure of activity-based working behaviors. In our initial sample (Sample 1, N = 234), three subscales were identified: task - environment crafting, workday planning, and social needs prioritization. In the replication sample (Sample 2, N = 434), this model also showed adequate fit. Moreover, task - environment crafting was related to general health and lower stress in sample 1 (multi-organization sample), but not in the single-organization sample (sample 2). Workday planning was associated with higher concentration in both samples and in the second sample with general health and work engagement; the latter was also related to social needs prioritization.</p>

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media SA, 2021
Keywords
activity-based working (ABW), flex office, scale development and validation, task-environment-fit, office types, proactive work behaviors, activity-based flexible office, crafting behaviors
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health Work Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-305120 (URN)10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655881 (DOI)000715859800001 ()34744852 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85118533565 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20211122

Available from: 2021-11-22 Created: 2021-11-22 Last updated: 2024-01-18Bibliographically approved
Otterbring, T., Bodin Danielsson, C. & Pareigis, J. (2021). Office types and workers' cognitive vs affective evaluations from a noise perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 36(4), 415-431
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Office types and workers' cognitive vs affective evaluations from a noise perspective
2021 (English)In: Journal of Managerial Psychology, ISSN 0268-3946, E-ISSN 1758-7778, Vol. 36, no 4, p. 415-431Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: This study aims to examine the links between office types (cellular, shared-room, small and medium-sized open-plan) and employees' subjective well-being regarding cognitive and affective evaluations and the role perceived noise levels at work has on the aforementioned associations. Design/methodology/approach: A survey with measures of office types, perceived noise levels at work and the investigated facets of subjective well-being (cognitive vs affective) was distributed to employees working as real estate agents in Sweden. In total, 271 useable surveys were returned and were analyzed using analyses of variance (ANOVAs) and a regression-based model mirroring a test of moderated mediation. Findings: A significant difference was found between office types on the well-being dimension related to cognitive, but not affective, evaluations. Employees working in cellular and shared-room offices reported significantly higher ratings on this dimension than employees working in open-plan offices, and employees in medium-sized open-plan offices reported significantly lower cognitive evaluation scores than employees working in all other office types. This pattern of results was mediated by perceived noise levels at work, with employees in open-plan (vs cellular and shared-room) offices reporting less satisfactory noise perceptions and, in turn, lower well-being scores, especially regarding the cognitive (vs affective) dimension. Originality/value: This is one of the first studies to compare the relative impact of office types on both cognitive and affective well-being dimensions while simultaneously testing and providing empirical support for the presumed process explaining the link between such aspects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald, 2021
Keywords
Affective evaluation, Cellular office, Cognitive evaluation, Negative deactivation, Noise, Office type, Open-plan office, Positive activation, Shared-room office, Subjective well-being
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-291695 (URN)10.1108/JMP-09-2019-0534 (DOI)000595696600001 ()2-s2.0-85096914810 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20250304

Available from: 2021-03-18 Created: 2021-03-18 Last updated: 2025-03-04Bibliographically approved
Troije, C. P., Jensen, E. L., Stenfors, C., Danielsson, C., Hoff, E., Martensson, F. & Toivanen, S. (2021). Outdoor Office Work - An Interactive Research Project Showing the Way Out. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID 636091.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Outdoor Office Work - An Interactive Research Project Showing the Way Out
Show others...
2021 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 12, article id 636091Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The physical boundaries of office work have become increasingly flexible. Work is conducted at multiple locations outside the office, such as at clients' premises, at home, in cafes, or when traveling. However, the boundary between indoor and outdoor environment seems to be strong and normative regarding how office work is performed. The aim of this study was to explore how office work may be conducted outdoors, understanding how it is being experienced by office employees and identifying its contextual preconditions. Based on a two-year interactive research project, the study was conducted together with a Swedish municipality. Fifty-eight participants engaged in the collaborative learning process, including 40 half-day workshops and reflective group discussions, co-interviews, and participants' independent experimentation of bringing work activities outdoors. Data was collected via interviews, group discussions and a custom-made mobile application. The results showed that a wide range of work activities could be done outdoors, both individually and in collaboration with others. Outdoor work activities were associated with many positive experiences by contributing to a sense of well-being, recovery, autonomy, enhanced cognition, better communication, and social relations, but also with feelings of guilt and illegitimacy. Conditions of importance for outdoor office work to happen and function well were found in the physical environment, where proximity to urban greenspaces stood out as important, but also in the sociocultural and organizational domains. Of crucial importance was managers' attitudes, as well as the overall organizational culture on this idea of bringing office work outdoors. To conclude, if working life is to benefit from outdoor office work, leaders, urban planners and policymakers need to collaborate and show the way out.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media SA, 2021
Keywords
outdoor office work, sustainable working life, interactive research, work norms, human nature interactions, urban greenspaces
National Category
Human Computer Interaction
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-296149 (URN)10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636091 (DOI)000643690600001 ()33912111 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85105001127 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20210601

Available from: 2021-06-01 Created: 2021-06-01 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved
Öhrn, M., Wahlstrom, V., Harder, M. S., Nordin, M., Pettersson-Stromback, A., Danielsson, C., . . . Jarvholm, L. S. (2021). Productivity, Satisfaction, Work Environment and Health after Relocation to an Activity-Based Flex Office-The Active Office Design Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), Article ID 7640.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Productivity, Satisfaction, Work Environment and Health after Relocation to an Activity-Based Flex Office-The Active Office Design Study
Show others...
2021 (English)In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, ISSN 1661-7827, E-ISSN 1660-4601, Vol. 18, no 14, article id 7640Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Implementation of activity-based flex offices (AFOs) are becoming increasingly common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an AFO on perceived productivity, satisfaction, work environment and health. Questionnaire data from the longitudinal, quasi-experimental Active Office Design Study was used. The study evaluates a public organization relocating staff to either an AFO or to cell offices. Measures from baseline, 6 and 18 months after relocation, were analyzed. Employees in the AFO experienced a decreased productivity and satisfaction with the office design. Lack of privacy as well as increased noise disturbance, less satisfaction with sit comfort and work posture were reported. Employees in the AFO with work tasks requiring a high degree of concentration experienced lower productivity while those with a high proportion of teamwork rated productivity to be continually high. No significant group differences were found between the two office types in general health, cognitive stress, salutogenic health indicators or pain in the neck, shoulder or back. The study highlights the importance of taking work characteristics into account in the planning and implementation process of an AFO. Flexible and interactive tasks seem more appropriate in an AFO, whereas individual tasks demanding concentration seem less fit.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG, 2021
Keywords
activity-based work, job performance, longitudinal study, new ways of working, occupational health, office worker
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-299299 (URN)10.3390/ijerph18147640 (DOI)000676147300001 ()34300090 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85110122622 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20210818

Available from: 2021-08-18 Created: 2021-08-18 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved
Chafi, M. B., Harder, M. & Bodin Danielsson, C. (2020). Workspace preferences and non-preferences in Activity-based Flexible Offices: Two case studies. Applied Ergonomics, 83, Article ID 102971.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Workspace preferences and non-preferences in Activity-based Flexible Offices: Two case studies
2020 (English)In: Applied Ergonomics, ISSN 0003-6870, E-ISSN 1872-9126, Vol. 83, article id 102971Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Activity-based Flexible Offices (AFOs) are innovations in workspace design that are being increasingly implemented in organisations. While most studies investigate satisfaction and perceived work support in AFOs, employees' workspace preferences are not addressed in the literature. The aims of this study were to (i) identify workspace preferences and non-preferences in AFOs, and (ii) investigate whether employees' workstation choices support their activities and align with their preferences. Two Swedish municipalities participated in the study. Data collection involved 27 semi-structured interviews and annotations on architectural drawings. The results showed that the interviewees preferred workstations that were both desirable and functional, and avoided workstations that were undesirable. This was due to functional, social, emotional and symbolic aspects of the workspaces as well as their physical structure and stimuli. The approach used in this paper can be adopted for improving the design of AFOs, thereby mitigating the stress of finding a suitable workstation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020
Keywords
Activity-based working (ABW), Workspace design, Artefact ecology
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-266738 (URN)10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102971 (DOI)000504789500003 ()31778864 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85075330656 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20200117

Available from: 2020-01-17 Created: 2020-01-17 Last updated: 2024-03-18Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-2432-7617

Search in DiVA

Show all publications