Open this publication in new window or tab >>KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Protein Science, Affinity Proteomics. KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Protein Science, Affinity Proteomics. KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cancer Immunology Discovery, Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Olink Proteomics, Uppsala Science Park, Uppsala, Sweden.
Olink Proteomics, Uppsala Science Park, Uppsala, Sweden.
Olink Proteomics, Uppsala Science Park, Uppsala, Sweden.
Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab. KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Protein Science, Affinity Proteomics.
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others...
2024 (English)In: British Journal of Cancer, ISSN 0007-0920, E-ISSN 1532-1827, Vol. 130, no 4, p. 620-627Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Objective: Current breast cancer risk prediction scores and algorithms can potentially be further improved by including molecular markers. To this end, we studied the association of circulating plasma proteins using Proximity Extension Assay (PEA) with incident breast cancer risk. Subjects: In this study, we included 1577 women participating in the prospective KARMA mammographic screening cohort. Results: In a targeted panel of 164 proteins, we found 8 candidates nominally significantly associated with short-term breast cancer risk (P < 0.05). Similarly, in an exploratory panel consisting of 2204 proteins, 115 were found nominally significantly associated (P < 0.05). However, none of the identified protein levels remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing. This lack of statistically significant findings was not due to limited power, but attributable to the small effect sizes observed even for nominally significant proteins. Similarly, adding plasma protein levels to established risk factors did not improve breast cancer risk prediction accuracy. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the levels of the studied plasma proteins captured by the PEA method are unlikely to offer additional benefits for risk prediction of short-term overall breast cancer risk but could provide interesting insights into the biological basis of breast cancer in the future.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2024
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-367053 (URN)10.1038/s41416-023-02541-2 (DOI)001133643300004 ()38135714 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85180231626 (Scopus ID)
Note
QC 20250714
2025-07-142025-07-142025-07-14Bibliographically approved