Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2025 (English)In: Scientific Reports, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 15, no 1, article id 29795Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Are larger models always better for 3D medical image segmentation? Despite the widespread adoption of 3D U-Net in various medical imaging tasks, this critical question remains underexplored. To challenge the common assumption, we systematically benchmark 18 U-Net variants—adjusting resolution stages, depth, and width—across 42 diverse public datasets. Our findings reveal that the answer is no: optimal architectures are highly task-specific, with smaller models often performing competitively. Specifically, we identify three key insights: (1) increasing resolution stages provides limited benefits for datasets with larger voxel spacing; (2) deeper networks offer limited advantages for anatomically complex shapes; and (3) wider networks provide minimal advantages for tasks with limited segmentation classes. Based on these insights, we provide practical guidelines for optimizing U-Net architectures according to dataset characteristics. Our findings highlight the limitations of the“bigger is better”paradigm while establishing a framework for balancing performance and computational efficiency in 3D medical image segmentation tasks.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nature Research, 2025
National Category
Medical Imaging
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-369353 (URN)10.1038/s41598-025-15617-1 (DOI)001552512000012 ()40813440 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105013313813 (Scopus ID)
Note
QC 20250904
2025-09-042025-09-042025-09-04Bibliographically approved