Open this publication in new window or tab >>Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA; Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA; Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Physics and CAS Key Laboratory of Strongly-Coupled Quantum Matter Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA; Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Applied Physics, Materials and Nanophysics. Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Applied Physics, Materials and Nanophysics.
Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA; Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA; Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA; Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Material Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Applied Physics, Light and Matter Physics.
Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA; Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Show others...
2023 (English)In: Nature Physics, ISSN 1745-2473, E-ISSN 1745-2481, Vol. 19, no 12, p. 1834-1840Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Electron-doped cuprates consistently exhibit strong antiferromagnetic correlations, leading to the prevalent belief that antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations mediate Cooper pairing in these unconventional superconductors. However, early investigations showed that although antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations create the largest pseudogap at hot spots in momentum space, the superconducting gap is also maximized at these locations. This presented a paradox for spin-fluctuation-mediated pairing: Cooper pairing is strongest at momenta where the normal-state low-energy spectral weight is most suppressed. Here we investigate this paradox and find evidence that a gossamer—meaning very faint—Fermi surface can provide an explanation for these observations. We study Nd2–xCexCuO4 using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and directly observe the Bogoliubov quasiparticles. First, we resolve the previously observed reconstructed main band and the states gapped by the antiferromagnetic pseudogap around the hot spots. Within the antiferromagnetic pseudogap, we also observe gossamer states with distinct dispersion, from which coherence peaks of Bogoliubov quasiparticles emerge below the superconducting critical temperature. Moreover, the direct observation of a Bogoliubov quasiparticle permits an accurate determination of the superconducting gap, yielding a maximum value an order of magnitude smaller than the pseudogap, establishing the distinct nature of these two gaps. We propose that orientation fluctuations in the antiferromagnetic order parameter are responsible for the gossamer states.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2023
National Category
Condensed Matter Physics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-347503 (URN)10.1038/s41567-023-02209-x (DOI)001178645300029 ()2-s2.0-85168818904 (Scopus ID)
Note
QC 20240619
2024-06-192024-06-192024-06-19Bibliographically approved