Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2025 (English)In: Chemical engineering research & design, ISSN 0263-8762, E-ISSN 1744-3563, Vol. 216, p. 186-199Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Spray towers have proven to be efficient in capturing gases and vapours, finding widespread use across various applications including CO2 capture. As there is scarce reference material regarding spray tower performances with different flow configurations other than the conventional counter-current flow, as well as the use of substitute solvents to MEA, there is a need to study different configurations and setup designs, including different placements of gas and liquid inlets in the absorber tower, to find the optimal configuration. In this study, the capture of CO2 from a CO2/N2 mixture using unpromoted potassium carbonate as the absorbent in a lab-scale spray tower was experimentally measured in four different flow configurations over a wide range of operating conditions, including gas and liquid flow rates, CO2 concentration, K2CO3 concentration and solvent temperature. Among four different configurations, the two sides co-current configuration, with gas nozzles positioned on opposite sides of the column and liquid coming from above, was found to be the most effective setup for enhancing CO2 capture efficiency by promoting better mixing and contact between gas and liquid.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Saunders Elsevier, 2025
Keywords
CO2 capture, Spray absorber towers, Spray nozzles, Absorption efficiency, Flow configurations, Potassium carbonate, Gas-liquid contact, Greenhouse gases, CCS
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-361165 (URN)10.1016/j.cherd.2025.02.020 (DOI)001439046500001 ()2-s2.0-85219084753 (Scopus ID)
Note
QC 20250324
2025-03-122025-03-122025-04-25Bibliographically approved