Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2021 (English)In: International Journal of Audiology, ISSN 1499-2027, E-ISSN 1708-8186, Vol. 60, no 2, p. 81-88Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Objective: IOI-HA response data are conventionally analysed assuming that the ordinal responses have interval-scale properties. This study critically considers this assumption and compares the conventional approach with a method using Item Response Theory (IRT). Design: A Bayesian IRT analysis model was implemented and applied to several IOI-HA data sets. Study sample: Anonymised IOI-HA responses from 13273 adult users of one or two hearing aids in 11 data sets using the Australian English, Dutch, German and Swedish versions of the IOI-HA. Results: The raw ordinal responses to IOI-HA items do not represent values on interval scales. Using the conventional rating sum as an overall score introduces a scale error corresponding to about 10 − 15% of the true standard deviation in the population. Some interesting and statistically credible differences were demonstrated among the included data sets. Conclusions: It is questionable to apply conventional statistical measures like mean, variance, t-tests, etc., on the raw IOI-HA ratings. It is recommended to apply only nonparametric statistical test methods for comparisons of IOI-HA results between groups. The scale error can sometimes cause incorrect conclusions when individual results are compared. The IRT approach is recommended for analysis of individual results.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2021
Keywords
behavioural measures, Hearing aids, IOI-HA, Item Response Theory
National Category
Otorhinolaryngology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-287123 (URN)10.1080/14992027.2020.1813338 (DOI)000568905100001 ()32917111 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85090975582 (Scopus ID)
Note
QC 20250318
2020-12-032020-12-032025-03-18Bibliographically approved