kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Yudhistira, Ryutaka
Publications (2 of 2) Show all publications
Yudhistira, R., Khatiwada, D. & Sanchez, F. (2022). A comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries for grid energy storage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 131999, Article ID 131999.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries for grid energy storage
2022 (English)In: Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN 0959-6526, E-ISSN 1879-1786, Vol. 358, p. 131999-, article id 131999Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Lithium-ion battery technology is one of the innovations gaining interest in utility-scale energy storage. However, there is a lack of scientific studies about its environmental performance. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impacts of lithium-ion batteries and conventional lead-acid batteries for stationary grid storage applications using life cycle assessment. The cradle-to-grave life cycle study shows that the environmental impacts of the lead-acid battery measured in per "kWh energy delivered " are: 2 kg CO2eq (climate change), 33 MJ (fossil fuel use), 0.02 mol H + eq (acidification potential), 10- 7 disease incidence (PM(2.5 )emission), and 8 x 10(-4 )kg Sbeq (minerals and metals use). The nickel cobalt aluminum battery is the best performer for climate change and resource use (fossil fuels) among the analysed lithium-ion batteries, with 45% less impact. The nickel cobalt manganese battery performs better for the acidification potential and particulate matter impact categories, with 67% and 50% better performance than lead-acid. The lithium iron phosphate battery is the best performer at 94% less impact for the minerals and metals resource use category. The use stage electricity and battery cell manufacturing processes have the highest contribution for the most impact categories. The sensitivity analysis shows that the use-phase environmental impact decreases with an increase in renewable energy contribution in the use phase. The lithium-ion batteries have fewer environmental impacts than lead-acid batteries for the observed environmental impact categories. The study can be used as a reference to decide how to substitute lead acid batteries with lithium-ion batteries for grid energy storage applications.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV, 2022
Keywords
Life cycle assessment, Lithium-ion batteries, Lead-acid battery systems, Grid storage application
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-313723 (URN)10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131999 (DOI)000800476700002 ()2-s2.0-85129315779 (Scopus ID)
Funder
StandUp
Note

QC 20220610

Available from: 2022-06-10 Created: 2022-06-10 Last updated: 2026-04-23Bibliographically approved
Rakhsia, K., Hassen, M., Yudhistira, R., Ruiz, N., Chowdry, A. P. & Ropero Pérez, G. (2020). Polygeneration System Design for Filipinas ETCR, Colombia.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Polygeneration System Design for Filipinas ETCR, Colombia
Show others...
2020 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This article develops and simulates a hybrid energy system to supply electricity to a rural area where there is limited electricity distribution network. The population under study is the former AETCR Filipinas in the municipality of Arauquita, Colombia. The supply of electricity in this settlement has frequent interruptions and considerable voltage fluctuations, reducing the user’s reliability and comfort. As a consequence, a hybrid system integrated by photovoltaic modules and biomass genset is proposed. The main advantage of hybrid systems is that they provide energy independence by reducing the previously mentioned problems and make use of the existing renewable resources on the territory of the installation for energy generation purposes.

Publisher
p. 28
Keywords
Polygeneration, Rural Energy system, ETCR, AETCR
National Category
Energy Engineering
Research subject
Energy Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-295237 (URN)
Note

QC 20210604

Available from: 2021-05-18 Created: 2021-05-18 Last updated: 2024-03-18Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications