kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Flue gas Condensate Cleaning via Air Gap Membrane Distillation
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Energy Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0923-9010
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Energy Technology, Heat and Power Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3661-7016
Scarab Development AB.
2020 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Combined heat and power plants (CHP) require advanced pollution controls in order to ensure acceptable environmental performance. Flue gas condensate cleaning is a critical operation in this regard, enabling high separation efficiencies for particles, heavy metals, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, and other contaminants – all while enhancing the thermal output of the CHP unit. The current trend is to employ membrane technologies such as reverse osmosis (RO) for purification and water recovery. Although RO-based treatment is a proven and mature technology, there are several disadvantages. RO operates with very high pressure differences, causing high mechanical loading and subsequent deterioration of membrane performance and lifetime. Moreover, biofouling is a well-known problem with RO, often requiring extensive use of harsh pretreatment chemicals. Concerning the limitations of RO, there is a need to consider alternative cleaning methods. For the purpose, membrane distillation is introduced as a promising technology for flue gas condensate cleaning in this study. The experimental tests have been performed using an Air Gap Membrane Distillation (AGMD) bench scale unit in order to determine the potential of membrane distillation (MD) for flue gas condensate cleaning. The real flue gas condensate samples were collected from Stockholm Exergi plant. The results show that high quality condensate was recovered having conductivity ~0.5 mS/m, pH ~5, TOC <0.5 ppm, TDS <10 ppm, COD <5 ppm, turbidity <1 NTU, total hardness <0.1 °dH and alkalinity <2.4 mg HCO3/L. Moreover, the outcomes present that MD also provides better performance as compared to RO in terms of contaminants concentration i.e., total ammonia <0.1 ppm, mercury <0.02 ppb, zinc <4 ppb and copper <1 ppb. Results from current study show that the treated condensate cannot only be reused as boiler water but disposing it into water bodies is also acceptable under strict environmental regulations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sydney, Australia, 2020.
Keywords [en]
CHP plants, Flue gas condensate cleaning, Membrane Distillation, Separation efficiency
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Research subject
Chemical Engineering; Energy Technology; Energy Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-281444OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-281444DiVA, id: diva2:1469083
Conference
International Membrane Science & Technology Conference
Funder
StandUp
Note

QC 20200930

Available from: 2020-09-21 Created: 2020-09-21 Last updated: 2026-04-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Noor, Imtisal-e-Martin, Andrew R.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Noor, Imtisal-e-Martin, Andrew R.
By organisation
Energy TechnologyHeat and Power Technology
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 376 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf