kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
False Positive Results in SARS-CoV-2 Serological Tests for Samples From Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Diseases
Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden.;Karolinska Inst, Ctr Mol Med, Stockholm, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden.;Karolinska Inst, Ctr Mol Med, Stockholm, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden.;Karolinska Inst, Ctr Mol Med, Stockholm, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden.;Karolinska Inst, Ctr Mol Med, Stockholm, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Frontiers in Immunology, E-ISSN 1664-3224, Vol. 12, article id 666114Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases are often treated with immunosuppressants and therefore are of particular concern during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Serological tests will improve our understanding of the infection and immunity in this population, unless they tests give false positive results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the specificity of SARS-Cov-2 serological assays using samples from patients with chronic inflammatory diseases collected prior to April 2019, thus defined as negative. Samples from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS, n=10), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n=47) with or without rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP2) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, n=10) with or without RF, were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using 17 commercially available lateral flow assays (LFA), two ELISA kits and one in-house developed IgG multiplex bead-based assay. Six LFA and the in-house validated IgG assay correctly produced negative results for all samples. However, the majority of assays (n=13), gave false positive signal for samples from patients with RA and SLE. This was most notable in samples from RF positive RA patients. No false positive samples were detected in any assay using samples from patients with MS. Poor specificity of commercial serological assays could possibly be, at least partly, due to interfering antibodies in samples from patients with chronic inflammatory diseases. For these patients, the risk of false positivity should be considered when interpreting results of the SARS-CoV-2 serological assays.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media SA , 2021. Vol. 12, article id 666114
Keywords [en]
SARS-CoV-2, autoimmunity, autoantibodies, diagnostics, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid factor
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-296395DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.666114ISI: 000651054500001PubMedID: 34012450Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85106067732OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-296395DiVA, id: diva2:1574249
Note

QC 20211208

Available from: 2021-06-28 Created: 2021-06-28 Last updated: 2025-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Månberg, AnnaPin, ElisaNilsson, PeterHober, Sophia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Månberg, AnnaPin, ElisaNilsson, PeterHober, Sophia
By organisation
Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLabAffinity ProteomicsProtein Technology
In the same journal
Frontiers in Immunology
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 121 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf