kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Retaining multi-functionality in a rapidly changing urban landscape: insights from a participatory, resilience thinking process in Stockholm, Sweden
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6452-5696
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; North-West University, Unit for Environmental Sciences, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering.
2021 (English)In: Ecology and Society, E-ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 26, no 4, article id 17Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Urban social-ecological resilience research has focused on conceptual explorations, while less attention has been paid tohow resilience thinking in practice may inform urban development. Using the rapidly urbanizing landscape in Stockholm as a case, weexplore the urban specifics of resilience thinking practice and thereby contribute to the development of knowledge and practice ofsocial-ecological resilience thinking generally. The study addresses an urban wicked problem: how to ensure that people continue tohave access to the means necessary to realize benefits from green blue infrastructure, when the city is changing and governance isfragmented. Drawing on insights from the design and implementation of a participatory dialogue process, we outline methodologicaladaptations to a resilience informed system exploration, to better accommodate the complexity of urban systems. The participatoryprocess included three phases: basic system understanding, dealing with change over time, and identifying alternative ways forward.Different knowledge elicitation and deliberation methods were deployed within workshops, surveys, and interviews, and were paralleledby a thorough reflexive analysis of process outcomes. The main discussion points are stakeholder participation, the role of discourses,identities and mandates, agency, and adaptive capacity, and alternative strategies for dealing with change. Deep knowledge of thecomplexities of urban land use and governance requires the involvement of diverse stakeholders. Handling this diversity poses achallenge for process design: combining the ambition of an inclusive process and the need to be relevant with the use of bridgingconcepts increases the risk of reducing the level of complexity of the deliberative process. There is also a risk of participation bias,where stakeholders knowledgeable about the green blue infrastructure are easier to engage compared to stakeholders with knowledgeabout drivers of change and urban governance, which will influence the system understanding and envisioned alternative pathways fortaking action.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Resilience Alliance, Inc. , 2021. Vol. 26, no 4, article id 17
Keywords [en]
agency; collective capacity; densification; green and blue infrastructure; participatory methods; process design; reflexive practice; scenarios; urban social-ecological resilience
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-305456DOI: 10.5751/ES-12432-260417ISI: 000744209100011Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85110173113OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-305456DiVA, id: diva2:1615054
Projects
Enable
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2015-00734
Note

QC 20220214

Available from: 2021-11-29 Created: 2021-11-29 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1386 kB)393 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1386 kBChecksum SHA-512
98318335cc2f5a4021c35bf04ddb46f41916ddf2df72b9ac87389560c6a19878962943160b36f64bc8a06be976ac6f844f5bd5c77ac70f88453672a8b7434666
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopushttps://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12432-260417

Authority records

Borgström, SaraBjörklund, Tove

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borgström, SaraBjörklund, Tove
By organisation
Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering
In the same journal
Ecology and Society
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 414 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1517 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf