kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
When Agnes has your back: On separatist methods in gender equality work
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Accounting, finance, economics and organization (AFEO). (Fosfor/organisation, ledning och förändring)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4094-6899
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.). (Fosfor/Organisation, ledning och förändring)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6587-5711
2021 (English)In: Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap, ISSN 1654-5443, E-ISSN 2001-1377, Vol. 42, no 1, p. 55-76Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this paper is to develop our theoretical understanding of the transformative potential of separatist methods in gender equality work by studying a women-only programme at a male-dominated higher education institution in Sweden. The analysis explores in what way a separatist method, which has an interactive design and content with a power perspective, can support change leadership. Extant research has criticized women-only programmes for excluding men from gender equality work, and for placing the responsibility for gender inequalities and change efforts on women. This critique is based on analyses of women-only programmes that are intended to support women in their careers on an individual level. Findings show that the studied method supports the participants in their change leadership. They highlight that the common understanding, sense of belonging and agency that emerged within the programme were all a source of both emotional and intellectual empowerment, here labelled “collective empowerment”. Frustration emanating from increased awareness is also handled through “collective empowerment”. The study concludes that the critique against women-only programmes is not relevant for initiatives that conceive gender equality work as organisational change. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala, 2021. Vol. 42, no 1, p. 55-76
Keywords [en]
Separatist method, women-only programmes, organisational change, collective empowerment, potential for change, gender equality work
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Industrial Economics and Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-308489OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-308489DiVA, id: diva2:1635934
Note

QC 20220210

Available from: 2022-02-08 Created: 2022-02-08 Last updated: 2024-03-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(248 kB)201 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 248 kBChecksum SHA-512
3dd1487f4556cc4d4f78ac2a60d2563140512f4a5efef9fe097f42278ddb9ecac93c0381f53923a3f75b57321d23ddc2a5a550408f21ee637fb57e50d2f69e9e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Wahl, AnnaHolgersson, Charlotte

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wahl, AnnaHolgersson, Charlotte
By organisation
Accounting, finance, economics and organization (AFEO)Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.)
In the same journal
Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 201 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 533 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf