kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Differences in risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers
Karolinska Univ Hosp, SE-14186 Stockholm, Sweden..
Karolinska Univ Hosp, SE-14186 Stockholm, Sweden..
KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab. KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Protein Science, Affinity Proteomics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4657-8532
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Protein Science, Protein Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0605-8417
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Preventive Medicine Reports, E-ISSN 2211-3355, Vol. 24, article id 101518Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are a risk group for SARS-CoV-2 infection, but which healthcare work that conveys risk and to what extent such risk can be prevented is not clear. Starting on April 24th, 2020, all employees at work (n = 15,300) at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden were invited and 92% consented to participate in a SARS-CoV-2 cohort study. Complete SARS-CoV-2 serology was available for n = 12,928 employees and seroprevalences were analyzed by age, sex, profession, patient contact, and hospital department. Relative risks were estimated to examine the association between type of hospital department as a proxy for different working environment exposure and risk for seropositivity, adjusting for age, sex, sampling week, and profession. Wards that were primarily responsible for COVID-19 patients were at increased risk (adjusted OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.65-2.32) with the notable exception of the infectious diseases and intensive care units (adjusted OR 0.86 (95% CI 0.66-1.13)), that were not at increased risk despite being highly exposed. Several units with similar types of work varied greatly in seroprevalences. Among the professions examined, nurse assistants had the highest risk (adjusted OR 1.62 (95% CI 1.38-1.90)). Although healthcare workers, in particular nurse assistants, who attend to COVID-19 patients are a risk group for SARS-CoV-2 infection, several units caring for COVID-19 patients had no excess risk. Large variations in seroprevalences among similar units suggest that healthcare work-related risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection may be preventable.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2021. Vol. 24, article id 101518
Keywords [en]
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Healthcare workers
National Category
Infectious Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-309056DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101518ISI: 000746610100062PubMedID: 34458081Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85113485012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-309056DiVA, id: diva2:1639361
Note

QC 20220221

Available from: 2022-02-21 Created: 2022-02-21 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Nilsson, PeterHober, SophiaPin, ElisaMånberg, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, PeterHober, SophiaPin, ElisaMånberg, Anna
By organisation
Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLabAffinity ProteomicsProtein Technology
In the same journal
Preventive Medicine Reports
Infectious Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 176 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf