kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Simulating Airplane Aerodynamics with Body Forces: Actuator Line Method for Nonplanar Wings
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Engineering Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Acoustics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9360-7300
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Engineering Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Acoustics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5913-5431
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Engineering Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Acoustics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7864-3071
2023 (English)In: AIAA Journal, ISSN 0001-1452, E-ISSN 1533-385X, Vol. 61, no 5, p. 2048-2059Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Two configurations typical of fixed-wing aircraft are simulated with the actuator line method (ALM): a wing with winglets, and a T tail. The ALM is extensively used in rotor simulations to model the blades by body forces, which are calculated from airfoil data and the relative flow velocity. This method has not been used to simulate airplane aerodynamics, despite its advantage of allowing coarser grids. This may be credited to the failure of the uncorrected ALM to accurately predict forces near the tip of the wings, even for simple configurations. The recently proposed vortex-based smearing correction shows improved results, suggesting those limitations are part of the past. For the nonplanar configurations studied in this work, differences between the ALM with the original smearing correction and a nonlinear lifting line (LL) method are observed near the intersection of surfaces because the circulation generated in the numerical simulation differs from the calculated corrected circulation. A vorticity magnitude correction is proposed, which improves the agreement between the ALM and the LL method. This second-order correction resolves the ambiguity in the velocity used to define the lift force. The good results indicate that the improved ALM can be used for airplane aerodynamics, with an accuracy similar to the LL method.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) , 2023. Vol. 61, no 5, p. 2048-2059
National Category
Fluid Mechanics Vehicle and Aerospace Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-330912DOI: 10.2514/1.J062398ISI: 000937607700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85152562998OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-330912DiVA, id: diva2:1780274
Note

QC 20230705

Available from: 2023-07-05 Created: 2023-07-05 Last updated: 2026-03-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kleine, VitorHanifi, ArdeshirHenningson, Dan S.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kleine, VitorHanifi, ArdeshirHenningson, Dan S.
By organisation
Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Acoustics
In the same journal
AIAA Journal
Fluid MechanicsVehicle and Aerospace Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 165 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf